This paper discusses the theoretical framework for the Current Life Orientation Scale. This instrument measures the scope of personal values in five broad areas. Investigations with three age groups (124 African-Americans and 20 older volunteers) show that all five subscores have high reliability and are not significantly affected by social desirability. Patterns of correlations with Rokeach's Value Survey (n = 71) and Coopersmith's Self-esteem Inventory (n = 32) provide evidence regarding the convergent and discriminant validity of the scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W.VernonP. E.LindzeyG. (1951) A study of values. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
BraithwaiteV. A.LawH. G. (1985) Structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach Value Survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 250–263.
3.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
4.
EdwardsA. L. (1957) Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
5.
EriksonE. H. (1959) Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.
6.
GrovetantH. D.ThornbeckeW.MeyerM. L. (1982) An extension of Marcia's identity status interview into the interpersonal domain. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 33–48.
7.
HeathR. L.FogelD. S. (1978) Terminal and instrumental? An inquiry into Rokeach's Value Survey. Psychological Reports, 42, 1147–1154.
8.
KluckhohnC. (1952) Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In ParsonsT.ShilsE. (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press. Pp. 388–433.
9.
OrtonyA.CloreG. L.CollinsA. (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
10.
RokeachM. (1973) The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
