The effects of practicing computerized exercises in class by 59 learning disabled students who received an 8-hr. training program, 30 min. per week, were evaluated. Six exercises designed to facilitate basic cognitive skills development were used. Twelve subjects were assigned to a control group without any form of intervention. Covariance analysis (pretest scores used as covariates) showed a significant effect of training on mental arithmetic. These results suggest that practicing a computerized exercise of mental arithmetic can facilitate the automatization of basic arithmetic skills (addition, subtraction, and multiplication). The nature, progress, and evaluation of such types of intervention are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. T.DykmanT. A. (1982) Automatic and effortful information-processing deficits in children with learning and attention disorders. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 12–22.
BeattieR. D.OwenN. (1985) Preliminary study of cognitive retraining via computer-based activities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1130.
4.
Ben-YishayY.DillerL. (1983) Cognitive remediation. In RosenthalM.GriffithE. R.BondM. R.MillerJ. D. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the head injured adult. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis. Pp. 367–380.
5.
BracyO. L. (1983) Computer based cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 1, 7–8, 18.
6.
BracyO. L. (1986) Cognitive rehabilitation: A process approach. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 4(2), 10–17.
7.
CarrierC.PostT. R.HeckW. (1985) Using microcomputers with fourth-grade students to reinforce arithmetic skillsJournal of Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 45–51.
8.
ChiangB. (1986) Initial learning and transfer effects of microcomputer drills on LD student multiplication skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 118–123.
9.
DillerL. (1976) A model for cognitive retraining in rehabilitation. The Clinical Psychologist, 26, 13–15.
10.
EngumE.SbordoneR.StoryT. (1987) Hard talk about software. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 5(4), 8–16.
11.
FerlandC. (1988) Effets de la pratique d'un jeu informatisé sur le développement des habiletés visuo-spatiales chez des enfants présentant une dysfonction cérébrale mineure. Unpublished master's thesis, Université Laval, Québec.
12.
FleischnerJ. E.GarnettK.ShepardM. J. (1982) Proficiency in arithmetic basic facts computation of learning disabled and non-disabled children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4, 47–56.
13.
GarnettK.FleischnerJ. E. (1983) Automatization and basic fact performance of normal and learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 223–230.
14.
GerberM. M. (1986) Effects of errorless and repeated practice using microcomputer-administered spelling dictation for learning handicapped students. Technical Report No. 31, Univer. of California, Project TEECh, Santa Barbara, CA.
15.
GianutsosR.AlwangG. (1985) Personal computing and the transformation of an injured brain into an active mind. Paper presented at the Conference on Microcomputer Rehabilitation of Brain Damaged Adults, New York, NY.
16.
GianutsosR.KlitznerC. (1981) Computer programs for cognitive rehabilitation. Bayport, NY: Life Sciences Assoc.
17.
GoldmanS. R.MertzD. L. (1986) Developing automaticity in retrieving word meaning: Microcomputer practice by learning handicapped students. Technical Report No. 24, Univer. of California, Project TEECh, Santa Barbara, CA.
18.
GoldmanS. R.MertzD. L.PellegrinoJ. W. (1986) Microcomputer delivery of addition drill and practice to math-disabled learners: Interim Report II. Technical Report No. 26, Univer. of California, Project TEECh, Santa Barbara, CA.
GoldmanS. R.PellegrinoJ. W. (1987) Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 144–154.
21.
GoldmanS. R.PellegrinoJ. W.MertzD. L. (1985) Microcomputer delivery of addition drill and practice to math-disabled learners: Interim Report I. Technical Report No. 25, Univer. of California, Project TEECh, Santa Barbara, CA.
22.
GreenfieldP. M. (1984) Mind and media: The effect of television, video games and computers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
23.
HasselbringT. (1985) A chronometric analysis of the effects of computer-based drill and practice in addition and subtraction. Paper presented at the First Invitational Research Symposium on Special Education Technology, Washington, DC.
24.
HasselbringT.GoinL. I.BransfordJ. D. (1988) Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(6), 1–67.
25.
HofmeisterA. (1983) Microcomputer applications in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
HowellR.SidorenkoE.JuriaJ. (1987) The effects of computer use on the acquisition of multiplication facts by a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 336–341.
27.
HowellR. D.GraicaJ. (1985) The effects of computer use on the generalization of learning with a learning disabled student. Paper presented at the First Invitational Research Symposium on Special Education Technology, Washington, DC.
28.
KailR.PellegrinoJ. W. (1985) Human intelligence, perspectives and prospects. New York: Freeman.
29.
KurlychekR. T.GlandA. E. (1984) The use of microcomputers in the cognitive rehabilitation of brain injured persons. In SchwartzM. D. (Ed.), Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Hayworth. Pp. 245–256.
30.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
31.
LaroseS. (1989) Application de la micro-informatique en rééducation cognitive: Efficacité d'un programme d'entraînement des habiletés spatiales. Unpublished master's thesis, Université Laval, Québec.
32.
LesgoldA. M. (1983) A rationale for computer-based reading instruction. In WilkensonA. C. (Ed.), Classroom computers and cognitive science. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 167–181.
33.
LikertR.QuashaW. H. (1970) Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test. New York: Psychological Corp.
34.
LorsbachT. C. (1982) Individual differences in semantic encoding processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 476–480.
35.
LuriaA. R. (1963) Restoration of brain function after brain injury. New York: Macmillan.
36.
LynchW. (1986) An update on software in cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 4(3), 14–18.
37.
LynchW. (1989) Ethics in computer-assisted cognitive retraining. Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, 4(1), 91–93.
38.
LynchW. J. (1981) TV games as therapeutic interventions. In LynchW. J., Rehabilitation of post-traumatic brain-damaged patients. Symposium of American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA. Pp. 2–15.
39.
LynchW. J. (1983a) Cognitive retraining using microcomputers, games and commercially available software. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 1, 19–22.
40.
LynchW. J. (1983b) Video games in remediation. In BaughmanS.ClagettP. (Eds.), Proceedings of a symposium on video games and human development. Cambridge, MA: Monroe C. Gurman Library. Pp. 25–28.
41.
MargalitM.WeiselA.ShulmanS. (1987) The facilitation of information processing in learning disabled children using computer games. Educational Psychology, 7(1), 47–54.
42.
McGeeM. G. (1979) Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–918.
43.
PellegrinoJ. W.GoldmanS. R. (1987) Information processing and elementary mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23–32.
44.
PellegrinoJ. W.KailR.Jr. (1982) Process analyses of spatial aptitude. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 311–365.
45.
PépinM. (1988) REEDUC (Exercices informatisés), Version 1.0. Québec: Microlude, Inc.
46.
PepinM. (1991) REEDUC (Exercices informatisés), Version 2.0. Québec: Microlude, Inc.
47.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1985) The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
48.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1988) Traumatic brain injury. Vol. II. Recovery and rehabilitation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
49.
RiethH. (1985) An analysis of the instructional and contextual variables that influence the efficacy of computer-based instruction for mildly handicapped secondary school students. Paper presented at the First Invitational Research Symposium on Special Education Technology, Washington, DC.
50.
SchleudererC.ShortS.CrislerJ. (1988) Outcome of cognitive rehabilitation of patients with head injuries. Journal of Rehabilitation, 54, 31–34.
51.
ShiffrinR. M.DumaisS. T. (1981) The development of automatism. In AndersonJ. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 111–140.
52.
SivakM.HillC. S.HensonD. L.ButlerB. P.SilberS. M.OlsonP. L. (1984) Improved driving performance following perceptual training in persons with brain damage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65, 163–167.
53.
SivakM.HillC. S.OlsonP. L. (1984) Computerized video tasks as training techniques for driving-related perceptual deficits of persons with brain damage: A pilot evaluation. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Research, 7, 389–398.
54.
SpearL. C.SternbergK. J. (1986) An information-processing framework for understanding learning disabilities. In CeciS. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 2–30.
55.
SternbergR. J. (1984) Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 269–315.
56.
SternbergR. J. (1985) Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
57.
SternbergR. J.WagnerR. K. (1982) Automatization failure in learning disabilities. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 18, 205–212.
58.
WillemsG.NoelA.EvrardP. (1979) Les troubles de l'apprentissage scolaire: Examen neuropédiatrique des fonctions de l'apprentissage de l'enfant d'âge préscolaire. Paris: Doin.
