108 students were classified as preferring either a style of left or right hemisphericity using Zenhausern's Preference Questionnaire. The students then completed two scales designed to measure belief in extrasensory perception (ESP). Students who scored as preferring a right style scored higher on belief in ESP than those who preferred a left style. The results are consistent with previous findings which suggest a connection between right hemisphere functions (e.g., imagery) and belief in ESP.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcockJ. E.OtisL. P. (1980) Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal. Psychological Reports, 46, 479–482.
2.
BeaumontJ. G.YoungA. W.McManusI. C. (1984) Hemisphericity: a critical review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 191–212.
3.
BeerJ. (1988) Hemispheric dominance inferred from Your Style of Learning and Thinking on reports of Necker cube reversals and maze learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 887–890.
4.
CorballisM. (1980) Laterality and myth. American Psychologist, 35, 284–295.
5.
CouncilJ. R.GreysonB.HuffK. D.SwettS. (1986) Fantasy-proneness, hypnotizability, and reports of paranormal experiences. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
6.
DunivinD.ZenhausernR. (1981) Differential hemispheric activation and handedness and hysterical and obsessive personality styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 23–25.
7.
HaraldssonE. (1981) Some determinants of belief in psychical phenomena. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 75, 297–309.
8.
IrwinH. J. (1985) A study of the measurement and the correlates of paranormal belief. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 79, 301–326.
9.
IrwinH. J. (1990) Fantasy proneness and paranormal beliefs. Psychological Reports, 66, 655–658.
10.
IrwinH. J. (1991) A study of paranormal belief, psychological adjustment, and fantasy proneness. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 317–331.
11.
JohnsL. B. (1989) Hemispheric preference and progressive-part or whole practice in beginning typewriting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 359–364.
MurphyK.LesterD. (1976) A search for correlates of belief in ESP. Psychological Reports, 38, 82.
14.
NestorP. G.SaferM. A. (1990) A multi-method investigation of individual differences in hemisphericity. Cortex, 26, 409–421.
15.
OexleJ.ZenhausernR. (1981) Differential hemispheric activation in good and poor readers. International Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 31–36.
16.
PersingerM. A.MakarecK. (1991) Greater right hemisphericity is associated with lower self-esteem in adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 1244–1246.
17.
RoigM.PlacakisN. (1992) Hemisphericity style, sex, and performance on a mirror-tracing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 1143–1148.
18.
SchlesingerJ. S. (1980) Laterality and myth continued. American Psychologist, 35, 1147–1149.
19.
SobalJ.EmmonsC. F. (1982) Patterns of belief in religious, psychic, and other paranormal phenomena. Zetetic Scholar, 9, 7–17.
20.
ThalbourneM. A. (1981) Extraversion and the sheep-goat variable: a conceptual replication. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 75, 105–120.
21.
ThalbourneM. A. (1984) Some correlates of belief in psychical phenomena: a partial replication of the Haraldsson findings. Parapsychology Review, 15(2), 13–15.
22.
ThalbourneM. A.HaraldssonE. (1980) Personality characteristics of sheep and goats. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 180–185.
23.
TorranceE. P.ReynoldsC. R.RiegelT.BallO. E. (1977) Your Style of Learning and Thinking, Forms A and B. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 563–573.
24.
VingianoW. (1989) Hemisphericity and personality. International Journal of Neuroscience, 44, 263–274.
25.
WierzbickiM. (1985) Reasoning errors and belief in the paranormal. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 489–494.
26.
ZenhausernR.GebhardtM. (1979) Hemispheric dominance in recall and recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 71–73.
27.
ZenhausernR.NickelL. (1979) Hemispheric dominance and maze learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 435–436.
28.
ZenhausernR.ReppetiJ. (1979) A comparison of two measures of cerebral dominance. Paper presented at the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, PA.
