This paper attempts to resolve the disagreement between Cliff (1988) and Kaiser (e.g., 1991) concerning the reliability of components as estimated by the Kaiser-Guttman rule. It is suggested that the differences result from starting with a definitional formula for reliability in the former as opposed to substituting in a concluding formula in the latter. The length of time during which the formula was not challenged is remarked.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CliffN. (1988) The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 276–279.
2.
CliffN.HamburgerC. H. (1967) The study of sampling errors in factor analysis by means of artificial experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 430–445.
3.
CronbachL. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
4.
GulliksenH. (1950) Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
5.
GuttmanL. (1954) Some necessary and sufficient conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161.
6.
JöreskogK. G. (1963) Statistical estimation in factor analysis. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
7.
KaiserH. F. (1957) Alpha-reliability of components and factors. (Unpublished manuscript, Bureau of Educational Research, College of Education, Univer. of Illinois).
8.
KaiserH. F. (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
9.
KaiserH. F. (1991) Coefficient alpha for a principal component and the Kaiser-Guttman rule. Psychological Reports, 68, 855–858.
10.
KaiserH. F.NormanW. T. (1991) Coefficients alpha for components. Psychological Reports, 69, 111–114.
11.
KuderG. F.RichardsonM. W. (1937) The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151–160.
12.
LordF. M.NovickM. R. (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
ZwickW. R.VelicerW. F. (1986) Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.
