The WISC—R Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale IQs of 66 referred students and the Stanford-Binet IV Test Composite scores of a different sample of 48 referred students correlated significantly with the reading subtests of the Woodcock-Johnson Revised, Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, and the Peabody Individual Achievement Test—Revised. The WISC—R Full Scale IQ correlated similarly with each reading score. The Verbal IQ correlated significantly more strongly than the Performance IQ with the reading scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeldmanD.GagnonJ. (1986) StatView 512 +: The interactive statistics and graphics program. New York: Brainpower.
2.
HinkleD. E.WiersmaW.JursS. G. (1979) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
3.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1985) Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement—Comprehensive Form. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
4.
MarkwardtF. C. (1989) Peabody Individual Achievement Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
5.
Microsoft Excel: Complete spreadsheet program with business graphics and database. (1988) Chicago, IL: Microsoft Corp.
6.
PrewettP. N.BardosA. N.FowlerD. (1990) Use of the KTEA and WRAT—R with learning disabled and referred but not placed students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 51–60.
7.
PrewettP. N.GiannuliM. M. (1991) The relationship between the reading subtests on four new achievement batteries (PIAT—R, Woodcock-Johnson—Revised, KTEA Comprehensive Form, and WRAT—R). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 166–174.
