This paper provides a summary of an examination of three lines of personality research involving response sets, empirical keying, and social desirability. The roots of these respective constructs are traced from their origins in Wundt's laboratory through the classic works of Meehl and Hathaway and Edwards up to Cattell's current reconstructions which take the form of trait-view theory and perturbation theory. After a careful analysis of the research and theoretical formulations from these three areas, it is concluded that Cattell's (1986) perturbation theory not only provides the most comprehensive system for understanding how respondents systematically distort their responses on personality questionnaires but also provides a solid framework for multivariate studies designed to test and refine his formulations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1985) The historical background of social psychology. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. I. (3rd ed.) New York: Random House. Pp. 1–46.
2.
BlockJ. (1965) The challenge of response sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3.
BoringE. G. (1950) A history of experimental psychology. (2nd ed.) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
BowersG. H. (1976) Experiments on story understanding and recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 512–537.
5.
BradleyA. F. (1978) Self-serving bias in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.
6.
CattellR. B. (1961) Theory of situational, instrument, second order, and refraction factors, in personality structure research. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 160–174.
7.
CattellR. B. (1963) Personality, role, mood, and situation-perception: A unifying theory of modulators. Psychological Review, 70, 1–18.
8.
CattellR. B. (1968) Trait-view theory and perturbations in ratings and self-ratings its application to obtaining pure trait score estimates in questionnaires. Psychological Review, 75, 96–113.
9.
CattellR. B. (1973) Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CattellR. B. (1979) Personality and learning theory: Vol. 1. The structure of personality in its environment. New York: Springer.
11.
CattellR. B. (1986) Dodging the third error source: Psychological interpretation and use of given scores. In CattellR. B.JohnsonR. (Eds.), Functional psychological testing: Principles and instruments. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 496–543.
12.
CattellR. B.DigmanJ. M. (1964) Theory of the structure of perturbations in observer ratings and questionnaire data in personality research. Behavioral Science, 9, 341–358.
13.
CattellR. B.EberH. W.TatsuokaM. M. (1980) Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality & Ability Testing.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. A. (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
16.
CruseD. B. (1963) Socially desirable responses in relation to grade level. Child Development, 34, 777–789.
17.
EdwardsA. L. (1953) The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 90–99.
18.
EdwardsA. L. (1957) The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.
19.
EdwardsA. L. (1970) The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20.
EdwardsA. L. (1990) Construct validity and social desirability. American Psychologist, 45, 287–289.
21.
FurnhamA. (1979) Assertiveness in three cultures: Multidimensionality and cultural differences. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 522–527.
22.
FurnhamA. (1986) Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385–400.
23.
FurnhamA.HendersonM. (1982) The good, the bad and the mad: Response bias in self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 311–320.
24.
GordonL. V. (1952) Validities of the forced-choice and questionnaires methods of personality measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 407–412.
25.
GorsuchR. L. (1983) Factor analysis. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
GuerinR.InnesJ. M. (1989) Cognitive tuning sets: Anticipating the consequences of communication. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 8, 234–249.
27.
HartshorneH.MayM. S. (1928) Studies in deceit. New York: Macmillan.
28.
HoldenR. R.FekkenG. C. (1989) Three common social desirability scales: Friends, acquaintances, or strangers?Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 180–191.
29.
HummD. G.WadsworthG. W. (1935) The Humm-Wadsworth Temperament Scale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 92, 163–200.
30.
JacksonD. N. (1971) The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 229–248.
31.
KrogerR. O. (1967) Effects of role demands and test-cue properties upon personality test performance. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 304–312.
32.
KrogerR. O.TurnbullW. (1970) Effects of role demands and test-cue properties on personality test performance: Replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 381–387.
33.
KrogerR. O.TurnbullW. (1975) Invalidity of validity scales: The case of the MMPI. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 48–55.
34.
KuhnT. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
35.
KülpeO. (1909) Introduction to psychology. (Trans. PillsburyW. B.TitchenerE. B.) London: Swan Sonnenschein.
36.
LindenfieldD. (1978) Oswald Külpe and the Würzburg School. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14, 132–141.
37.
LuchinsA. S. (1942) Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54, No. 6 (Whole No. 248).
38.
LuchinsA. S.LuchinsE. H. (1989) Computer simulation, algorithms, and heuristics in Einstellung effects. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 115, 51–80.
39.
MandlerJ. M.MandlerG. (1964) Thinking: From association to Gestalt. New York: Wiley.
40.
McCarreyM.EdwardsH. P.RozarioW. (1982) Ego-relevant feedback, affect, and self-serving attributional bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 189–194.
41.
McCraeR.CostaP. (1983) Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882–888.
42.
MeehlP. E.HathawayS. R. (1946) The K factor as a suppressor variable in the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 526–564.
43.
MillerD. T.RossM. (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.
44.
MillhamJ.KellogR. (1980) Need for social approval: Impression management or self-deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 445–457.
45.
NicholsonR. A.HoganR. (1990) The construct validity of social desirability. American Psychologist, 45, 290–292.
46.
NormanW. T. (1967) On estimating psychological relationships: Social desirability and self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 273–293.
47.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
OgdenR. M. (1951) Oswald Külpe and the Würzburg School. American Journal of Psychology, 64, 4–19.
49.
O'GradyK. E. (1988) The Marlowe-Crowne and Edwards Social Desirability Scales: A psychometric perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 87–101.
50.
PaulhusD. L. (1984) Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
51.
RorerL. G. (1965) The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 129–156.
52.
RosenzweigS. (1934) A suggestion for making verbal personality tests more valid. Psychological Review, 41, 400–401.
53.
RuchF. L. (1942) A technique for detecting attempts to fake performance on a self-inventory type of personality test. In McNemarQ.MerrillM. A. (Eds.), Studies in personality. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 229–234.
54.
SakiemH. A.GurR. (1979) Self-deception, other deception, and self-reported psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 213–215.
55.
SarbinT. R.AllenV. L. (1968) Role theory. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. Vol. I. (2nd ed.) New York: Random House. Pp. 488–567.
56.
SchlenkerB. R. (1975) Self-presentation: Managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1030–1037.
57.
SchlenkerB. R. (1985) The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Van GorpW. G.MeyerR. G. (1986) The detection of faking on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 742–747.
59.
WalshJ. A. (1990) Comment on social desirability. American Psychologist, 45, 289–290.
60.
WashburneJ. N. (1935) A test of social adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19, 125–144.
61.
WattH. S. (1905) Experimentelle Beiträge zu einer Theorie des Denkens. Archive für die gesamte Psychologie, 4, 289–436.
62.
WigginsJ. S. (1968) Personality structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 19, 293–350.
63.
WoodworthR. S.SellsS. B. (1935) An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Psychology, 18, 451–460.
64.
YarkinK. L.TownJ. P.HarveyJ. H. (1981) The role of cognitive sets in interpreting and remembering interpersonal events. In HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 289–308.
65.
ZajoncR. (1960) The process of cognitive tuning in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 159–167.
