College students completed a 17-item scale measuring the “propensity to argue controversial topics” and 7 other nominal-scale independent variables. They then read three editorial satires and checked which of five statements was the intended thesis of each satire's author. They also rated each satire on interestingness and funniness. Analysis indicated dependence between understanding of satire and sex and regular readership of “The Far Side.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DowlingR. E.FlintL. J. (1990) The argumentativeness scale: Problems and promise. Communication Studies, 41, 183–198.
2.
GrunerC. R. (1985) Advice to the beginning speaker on using humor—what the research tells us. Communication Education, 34, 142–146.
3.
GrunerC. R. (1988a) Prior attitude and perception of satirical theses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 677–678.
4.
GrunerC. R. (1988b) Prior attitude and understanding of editorial satire. Psychological Reports, 63, 54.
5.
GrunerC. R. (1989) A quasiexperimental study of the effect of humor preference and other variables on understanding/appreciation of editorial satire. Psychological Reports, 65, 967–970.
6.
GrunerC. R. (1990a) “Humor style” and understanding and appreciation of editorial satire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1053–1054.
7.
GrunerC. R. (1990b) Self-perceived humor style and understanding of editorial satire. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Humor, Sheffield, England, August 4.
8.
GrunerC. R.ShirleyR. G. (1989) Gender, cynicism, and reaction to editorial satire. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Humor, Laie, HI.
9.
PrerostF. J. (1982) A decade of change in humor appreciation among males and females: A relaxation of social and sex role restraints. In MintzL. E. (Ed.), Conference Abstracts: Third International Conference on Humor. Workshop Library on World Humour & American Humor Studies Association, Montgomery College. P. 83.
10.
ShirleyR. G.GrunerC. R. (1989) Self-perceived cynicism, sex, and reaction to gender-related satire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1048–1050.
