The effects of anxiety on the eyeblink component of the human startle response were measured in 32 college students. The manipulation of threat of shock was not successful in eliciting anxiety, suggesting that, while threat of shock can increase anxiety, this increase is not inevitable, illustrating the importance of a manipulation check of the effectiveness of the threat.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnthonyB. J. (1985) In the blink of an eye: implications of reflex modification for information processing. In AcklesP. K.JenningsJ. R.ColesM. G. H. (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology. Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 167–218.
2.
BlumenthalT. D. (1988) The startle response to acoustic stimuli near startle threshold: effects of stimulus rise and fall time, duration, and intensity. Psychophysiology, 25, 607–611.
3.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (1990) Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377–395.
4.
SpielbergerC. D. (1985) Anxiety, cognition, and affect: a state-trait perspective. In TumaH.MaserJ. (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 177–182.
5.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR. E. (1970) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.