Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Malay, the language spoken in Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia, is transcribed by both Arabic and Roman orthographies. Skilled Malay readers are trained in reading their language printed in these two dissimilar orthographies. This unique feature of Malay enables a study of the effects of orthography on processes of reading independently of language constraints. Using a Stroop Color-Word paradigm, naming the color of the ink used to print incongruent Malay color words in Roman is significantly longer (and more error-prone) than naming the same colors used to write incongruent color words in Arabic orthography. The results are discussed in relation to the effects of orthography on perceptual processes mediating lexical access.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baluch

(1991) Lexical decisions in Persian: a test for the orthographic depth hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Baluch

Besner

(1991) Visual word recognition: evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644–652.

Besner

(1987) On the relationship between orthographies and phonologies in visual word recognition. In Allport

D. A.

MacKay

Prinz

Scheerer

(Eds.), Language perception and production: shared mechanisms in listening, speaking, reading and writing. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 221–226.

Besner

Hildebrandt

(1987) Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese Kana. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 335–343.

Biederman

Tsao

(1979) On processing Chinese ideographs and English words, some implications from Stroop test results. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 125–132.

Comalu

P. E.

Wapner

J. R.

Werner

(1962) Interference effects of the Stroop Color-Word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47–53.

Henderson

(1982) Orthography and word recognition in reading. New York: Academic Press.

Macleod

C. M.

(1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

Omar

A. H.

(1972) Essays on Malaysian linguistics. Kuala Lampur: Dewan Bahasa Pustaka.

10.

Rumelhart

D. E.

McClelland

(1981) Interactive processing through spreading activation. In Lesgold

Perfetti

(Eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 37–60.

11.

Seidenberg

M. S.

(1985a) The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In Besner

Waller

T. G.

MacKinnon

G. E.

(Eds.), Reading research advances in theory and practice. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 192–252.

12.

Seidenberg

M. S.

(1985b) The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.

13.

Seidenberg

M. S.

Vidanovic

(1985) Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian and English: do they differ? Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.

14.

Shimron

Navon

(1980) The distribution of visual information in the vertical dimension of Roman and Hebrew letters. Visible Language, 14(5), 12.

15.

Shimron

Navon

(1981) The distribution of information within letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 483–491.

16.

Smith

M. C.

Kirsner

(1982) Language and orthography as irrelevant features in color-word and picture-word Stroop interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 153–170.

17.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–666.

On Processing the Roman and Arabic Orthographies of Malay: Some Implications from the Stroop Color-Word Test

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References