The fakability of two methodologically different role-play tests of assertion was examined. 30 undergraduates low in assertiveness were tested and retested on the Behavioral Assertiveness Test—Revised and the Idiographic Role-play Test. Half of the testees were instructed to fake assertion during the second testing. Analysis indicated that both tests were fakable; however, testees reported more difficulty faking the latter test than the former. The detection of faking may be possible, particularly on role-play tests employing an idiographic methodology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerR. F.HeimbergR. G. (1988) Assessment of social skills. In BellackA. S.HersenM. (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: a practical handbook. (3rd ed.) New York: Pergamon. Pp. 296–327.
2.
BellackA. S. (1983) Recurrent problems in the behavioral assessment of social skill. Behavior Research and Therapy, 21, 29–41.
3.
ChiazziE. G.HeimbergR. G.BeckerR. E.GanslerD. (1985) Personalized versus standard role-plays in the assessment of depressed patients' social skill. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 7, 121–133.
4.
EislerR. M.MillerP. M.HersenM. (1973) Components of assertive behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 295–299.
5.
KernJ. M. (1991) An evaluation of a novel role-play methodology: the standardized idiographic approach. Behavior Therapy, 22, 13–29.
6.
McFallR. M.LillesandD. B. (1971) Behavior rehearsal with modeling and coaching in assertion training. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 313–323.
7.
NietzelM. T.BernsteinD. A. (1976) Effects of instructionally mediated demand on the behavioral assessment of assertiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 500.
