The utility of Howarth's μ index for differentiating state and trait scales was examined given the various publications on this index since 1978. It is tentatively concluded that the index does differentiate state and trait scales; however, several concerns still need to be addressed. For example, the distribution of μ needs to be determined, along with tests of significance and more examples of the application of the index need to be reported in the open literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrindellW. A.GerlsmaC. (1990) The validity of the μ index for differentiation of state and trait scales. Psychological Reports, 67, 528–530.
2.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R.ZondermanA. B. (1987) Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 299–306.
3.
HowarthE. (1978) The μ index for differentiation of state and trait scales. Psychological Reports, 43, 474.
4.
HowarthE. (1988) Mood differences between four Galen personality types: Choleric, Sanguine, Phlegmatic, Melancholic. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 173–175.
5.
LoganP.LooR. (1979) Application of the μ index to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Reports, 44, 860–862.
6.
MichelsonL.MavissakalianM. (1983) Temporal stability of self-report measures in agoraphobia research. Behavior Research Therapy, 21, 695–698.
7.
OasterT. R. F. (1982) μ index for differentiation of state and trait scales with new stressor scales. Psychological Reports, 51, 272.
8.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR. E. (1970) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
