The hypothesis that predictable differences would exist between the mean cognitive style of new entrants and those of the longer serving “established” employees in certain departments while not in others was tested. Data from 99 employees from four departments of a large British pharmaceuticals company who completed the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory provided results broadly in line with the expectations of adaption-innovation theory and past research. The mean innovative cognitive style of new entrants to adaptive departments regressed towards the mean of the establishment and the occupational mean over time. In departments where there was no initial significant difference between the mean cognitive style of the new entrants and the established group, no significant shift was shown over time. Implications of these findings are suggested. The data also indicated norms for two occupational groups where previously they did not exist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClappR. G.DeCiantisS. M. (1989) Adaption-Innovation in large organizations: does cognitive style characterise actual behaviour of employees at work? An exploratory studyPsychological Reports, 65, 503–513.
2.
DershimerE. L. (1980) Study to identify the characteristics of teachers willing to implement computer-based instruction using microcomputers in the classroom. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Memphis State Univer., TN.
3.
DruckerP. F. (1969) Management's new role. Harvard Business Review, 47, 49–54.
4.
EttlieJ. E.O'KeefeR. D. (1982) Innovative attitudes, values, and intentions in organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 163–182.
5.
FoxallG. R. (1986) Managers in transition: an empirical test of Kirton's Adaption-Innovation theory and its implications for the mid-career M.B.A.Technovation, 4, 219–232.
6.
FoxallG. R.PayneA. F. (1989) A cross-cultural study of the cognitive styles of managerial functions and subfunctions. Journal of Human Relations, 42, 639–650.
7.
GoldsmithR. E. (1983) Dimensions of consumer innovativeness: an empirical study of open processing Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univer. of Alabama.
8.
GoldsmithR. E.McNeillyK. M.RussF. A. (1989) Similarity of sales representatives' and supervisors' problem-solving styles and the satisfaction-performance relationship. Psychological Reports, 64, 827–832.
9.
GoldsteinK. M.BlackmanS., (1981) Cognitive styles in personality. In FransellaF. (Ed.), Theory, measurement, and research. London: Methuen. Pp. 134–143.
10.
GulF. A. (1986) Adaption-Innovation as a factor in Australian accounting undergraduates' subject interests and career preferences. Journal of Accounting Education, 4, 203–209.
11.
HaywardG.EverettC. (1983) Adaptors and Innovators: data From the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory in a local authority setting. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 339–342.
12.
HollandP. A. (1987) Adaptors and Innovators: application of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory to bank employees. Psychological Reports, 60, 263–270.
13.
KellerR. T.HollandW. E. (1978) A cross-validation study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory in three research and development organizations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 563–570.
14.
KirtonM. J. (1976) Adaptors and Innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.
15.
KirtonM. J. (1980) Adaptors and innovators in organizations. Human Relations, 3, 213–234.
16.
KirtonM. J. (1987a) Adaptors and Innovators cognitive style and personality. In IsaksenS. G. (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: beyond the basics. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited. Pp. 282–304.
17.
KirtonM. J. (1987b) Adaotion-Innovation Inventory (KAI)—manual. (2nd ed.) Hatfield. Herts: Occupational Research Centre.
18.
KirtonM. J. (1987c) Adaptors and Innovators: problem solvers in organizations. In GronhaugK.KaufmannG. (Eds.), Innovation: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford, UK: Norwegian Press/Oxford Univer. Press. Pp. 65–65.
19.
KirtonM. J. (1989) Adaptors and Innovators: styles of creativity and problem-solving. London: Routledge.
20.
KirtonM.BaileyA.GlendinningW. (1991) Adaptors and Innovators: preference for educational procedures. Journal of Psychology, in press.
21.
KirtonM. J.DeCiantisS. M. (1989) Cognitive style in organisational climate. In KirtonM. J. (Ed.), Adaptors and Innovators: styles of creativity and problem-solving. London: Routledge. Pp. 79–96.
22.
KirtonM. J.McCarthyR. M. (1988) Cognitive climate and organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology61, 175–184.
23.
KirtonM. J.PenderS. R. (1982) The Adaption-Innovation continuum, occupational type and course selection. Psychological Reports, 51, 883–886.
24.
KuhnT. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolution. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
25.
LindsayP. (1985) Counselling to resolve a clash of cognitive styles. Technovation, 3, 57–67.
26.
LoweE. A.TaylorW. G. K. (1986) The management of research in the life sciences: the characteristics of researchers. R & DManagement, 16, 45–61.
27.
MessickS. (1976) Individuality in learning: implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
PratoPrevide G. (1984) Adattatori ed innovatori i risultati della standardizzazione italiana del KAI. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 81–134.
29.
PulvinoC. A. (1979) Teacher motivation and innovation and its relation to principal leader behaviour and organization structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Univer. of Wisconsin-Madison.
30.
ThomsonD. (1980) Adaptors and Innovators: a replication study on managers in Singapore and Malaysia. Psychological Reports, 47, 383–387.
31.
ThomsonD. (1985) A study of Singaporean executives: their attitudes, disposition, and work values. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Henley Management College/Brunel Univer.
