Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The correlations between initial perceptions of operant control, stress arousal, coping style, and reported outcomes of job hassles were examined. Ninety-eight subjects described a stressful situation, completed the Stress Arousal Checklist and a perceived control instrument. Two days later they completed the Ways of Coping Checklist. Subjects were followed for up to six weeks to judge whether or not the situation was resolved and by whom. Perceiving control of a hassle situation was highly associated with the situation being resolved. However, perceiving no control or insufficient resources did not predict outcome as clearly. Emotion-focused coping, but not problem-focused coping or stress arousal, distinguished situations resolved by the subject from those unresolved or resolved in some other way.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

L. Y.

Alloy

L. B.

(1980) Judgment of contingency: Errors and their implications. In Baum

Singer

J. E.

(Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology: Applications of personal control. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 111–130.

Blanchard-Fields

Irion

J. C.

(1988) The relation between locus of control and coping in two contexts age as a moderator variable. Psychology and Aging, 3, 197–203.

Folkman

(1982) An approach to the measurement of coping, Journal of Occupational Behavior, 3, 95–107.

Folkman

(1984) Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1980) An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

(1988) Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 466–475.

Folkman

Lazarus

R. S.

Dunkel-Schetter

DeLongis

Gruen

R. J.

(1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.

Frankenhaueser

(1981) Coping with stress at work. International Journal of Health Sciences, 11, 491–510.

Howard

Scott

R. A.

(1965) A proposed framework for the analysis of stress in the human organism. Behavioral Science, 10, 141–160.

10.

Knight

E. A.

(1987) Perceived control, coping style, and stress arousal in a job setting. In Humphrey

J. H.

(Ed.), Human stress: Current selected research. Vol. 2. New York: AMS Press. Pp. 55–72.

11.

Knight

E. A.

(1990) Gender differences in the relationship between perceived job control, locus of control, and stress outcomes. Paper presented at the First International Congress of Behavioral Medicine, Uppsala, Sweden.

12.

Langer

E. J.

(1975) The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.

13.

Langer

E. J.

(1979) The illusion of incompetence. In Perlmuter

L. C.

Monty

R. A.

(Eds.), Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 301–313.

14.

Lefcourt

H. M.

(1973) The functions of the illusions of control and freedom. American Psychology, 28, 417–425.

15.

Mackay

C. J.

(1980) The measurement of mood and psychophysiological activity using self-report techniques. In Martin

Zenables

P. H.

(Eds.), Techniques in psychophysiology. London: Wiley. Pp. 501–562.

16.

Mandler

(1979) Thought processes, consciousness, and stress. In Hamilton

Warburton

D. M.

(Eds.), Human stress and cognition: An information processing approach. New York: Wiley. Pp. 179–201.

17.

Mattlin

J. A.

Wethington

Kessler

R. C.

(1990) Situational determinants of coping and coping effectiveness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 103–122.

18.

Seligman

M. G. P.

(1975) Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

Perceived Control and Actual Outcomes of Hassle Situations on the Job

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References