This study replicates the 1975 research of Mueller and Shwedel on changing multiple-choice answers and extends the research to students of business administration. The results support earlier findings of a strong positive net point gain when students changed answers. Sex of the student was not a factor, while high-scoring students benefitted more from changing answers than low-scoring students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BathJ. A. (1967) Answer-changing behavior on objective examinations. Journal of Educational Research, 61, 105–107.
2.
CopelandD. A. (1972) Should chemistry students change answers on multiple-choice tests?Journal of Chemical Education, 49, 258.
3.
FooteR.BelinskyC. (1972) It pays to switch? Consequences of changing answers on multiple-choice examinations. Psychological Reports, 31, 667–673.
4.
JacksonP. F. (1978) Answer changing on objective tests. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 313–315.
5.
JacobsS. S. (1972) Answer changing on objective tests: Some implications for test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 1039–1044.
6.
MathewsC. C. (1929) Erroneous first impressions on objective tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 280–286.
7.
MuellerD. J.ShwedelA. (1975) Some correlates of net gain resultant from answer changing on objective achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 251–254.
8.
MuellerD. J.WasserV. (1977) Implications of changing answers on objective test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 9–13.
9.
ReileP. J.BriggsL. J. (1952) Should students change their initial answers on objective-type tests?: More evidence regarding an old problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 110–115.
10.
ReilingE.TaylorR. (1972) A new approach to the problem of changing initial responses to multiple choice questions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1, 67–70.
11.
VidelerD.HansenR. (1980) Answer changing on multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Education, 49, 18–20.
