The extent to which people believe that offensive jokes are consistent with joke tellers' attitudes was investigated. 135 college students indicated the extent to which they believe that there is congruence of joke and attitude when they tell offensive jokes or when others tell offensive jokes. Subjects who rated themselves as joke tellers attributed far less congruence between jokes and attitudes than subjects who rated others as joke tellers. The results are discussed in terms of the fundamental bias in attribution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FreudS. (1960) Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton.
2.
JohnsonA. M. (1990) Reproductive humor: An unobtrusive, omnidirectional estimate of attitudes and sex differences. (Unpublished manuscript, Centenary College).
3.
KaneT. R.SulsJ.TedeschiJ. T. (1977) Humour as a tool of social interaction. In ChapmanA. J.FootH. C. (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humour. Elmsford, NJ: Pergamon. Pp. 13–16.
4.
MendelW. M. (1971) Humor as an index of emotional means. Worm Runner's Digest, 13, 53–61.
5.
MurchisonW. (1990) “Me Bubba, you Jane.”National Review, May, 24–26.
6.
SulsJ. M.MillerR. L. (1976) Humor as an attribution index. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 256–259.
7.
WatsonD. (1982) The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent?Psychological Bulletin, 92, 682–700.
