Despite the fact that virtually all scientists reject astrology as unfounded superstition, it continues to hold a powerful grip on the belief-systems of millions of people. With the advent of computer technology, rigorous statistical tests have been carried out to examine the validity of the oft-heard claim that astrology works. The results of these recent tests are uniformly negative. Application of the scientific method then leads us to reject the astrological hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbellG. O. (1982) Exploration of the universe. (4th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
2.
AbellG. O. (1985) The alleged lunar effect. In FrazierK. (Ed.), Science confronts the paranormal. Buffalo, NYPrometheus. Pp. 228–234.
3.
BarthJ. R.BennettJ. T. (1974) Astrology and modern science revisited. Leonardo, 7(3), 235–237.
4.
BastedoR. W. (1981) An empirical test of popular astrology. In FrazierK. (Ed.), Paranormal borderlands of science. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 241–262.
5.
BokB. J.JeromeL. E.KurtzP. (1975) Objections to astrology—a statement by 186 leading scientists. The Humanist, 35(5), 4–6.
6.
CarlsonS. (1985) A double-blind test of astrology. Nature, 318, 419–425.
7.
Comtté Para. (1976) Considerations critiques sur une recherche faite par M. Gauquelin dans le domaine des influences planetaires. Nouvelles Brèves, 43, 327–343.
8.
CulverR. B.IannaP. A. (1984) The Gemini syndrome: a scientific evaluation of astrology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
9.
CulverR.RottonJ.KellyI. W. (1988) Geophysical variables and behavior: XLIX. Moon mechanisms and myths: a critical appraisal of explanations of purported lunar effects on human behavior. Psychological Reports, 62, 683–710.
10.
DeanG. (1987a) Does astrology need to be true? Part 1: A look at the real thing. Skeptical Inquirer, 11, 166–184.
11.
DeanG. (1987b) Does astrology need to be true? Part 2: The answer is no. Skeptical Inquirer, 11, 257–273.
12.
DeanG.KellyI. W.RottonJ.SaklofskeD. H. (1985) The Guardian astrology study: a critique and reanalysis. Skeptical Inquirer, 9, 327–338.
13.
DeanG.MatherA. (1977) Recent advances in natal astrology: a critical review 1900–1976. Rockport, MA: Para-Research.
14.
DicksonD. H.KellyI. W. (1985) The “Barnum effect” in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 57, 367–382.
15.
ErtelS. (1987a) Further grading of eminence: planetary correlations with musicians, painters, writers. Correlation, 7(1), 4–17.
16.
ErtelS. (1987b) Good news and bad news from Gauquelin replication trials. Unpublished work based on a paper presented at the 6th London Astrological Research Conference, 20–22 November 1987. Correlation, 7(2), 4–5. (Corrections in following issue).
17.
ErtelS. (1988a) Purifying Gauquelin's grain of gold. Paper presented at the Seventh Astrological Research Conference of the British Astrological Association and Urania Trust, London, 26–27 November.
18.
ErtelS. (1988b) Raising the hurdle for the athletes' Mars effect: association co-varies with eminence. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2(1), 53–82.
19.
EysenckH. J. (1979) Astrology: science or superstition?Encounter, 84(December), 85–90.
20.
EysenckH. J. (1983) Methodological errors by critics of astrological claims. Astro-Psychological Problems, 1(4), 14–17.
21.
EysenckH. J.NiasD. K. B. (1982) Astrology: science or superstition. New York: St. Martin's Press.
22.
FalkR. (1985) On coincidences. In FrazierK. (Ed.), Science confronts the paranormal. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 43–56.8.
23.
FraknoiA. (1989) Your astrology defense kit. Sky and Telescope, 78(August), 146–150.
24.
FrazierK. (Ed.) (1986a) Americans respect science, don't know much about it. Skeptical Inquirer, 10, 298.
25.
FrazierK. (Ed.) (1986b) Double-blind test of astrology avoids bias, still refutes the astrological hypothesis. Skeptical Inquirer, 10, 194–196.
FrazierK.KurtzP.BobM. L. (1988) Astrology and the presidency. Skeptical Inquirer, 13, 3–16.
28.
FreyJ.RottonJ.BarryT. (1979) The effects of the full moon upon behavior: another failure to replicate. Journal of Psychology, 103, 159–162.
29.
FullamF. A. (1984) Contemporary belief in astrology. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Sociology, Univer. of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
30.
GauquelinM. (1982) Zodiac and personality: an empirical study. Skeptical Inquirer, 6, 57–65.
31.
GauquelinM. (1983) The truth about astrology. London: Basil Blackwell.
32.
GauquelinM. (1984) Profession and heredity experiments: computer re-analysis and new investigations on the same material. Correlation, 4(1), 8–24.
33.
GingerichO. (1988) Astrology and astronomy. In KaufmannW. J.III (Ed.), Universe. (2nd ed.) New York: Freeman. Pp. 52–53.
34.
GlickP.SnyderM. (1986) Self-fulfilling prophecy: the psychology of belief in astrology. The Humanist, 46(3), 20–25, 50.
35.
HunterR. N.DerrJ. S. (1978) Prediction monitoring and evaluation program: a progress report. Earthquake Information Bulletin (USGS), 10(3), 93–96.
36.
IannaP. A.TolbertC. R. (1985) A retest of astrologer John McCall. Skeptical Inquirer, 9, 167–170.
37.
KellyI. W. (1979) Astrology and science: a critical examination. Psychological Reports, 44, 1231–1240.
38.
KellyI. W. (1982) Astrology, cosmobiology and humanistic astrology. In GrimP. (Ed.), Philosophy of science and the occultAlbany, NY: State Univer. of New York Press. Pp. 47–69.
39.
KellyI. W.CulverR.LoptsonP. J. (1989) Astrology and science: an examination of the evidence. In BiswasS. K.MalikD. C. V.VishveshwaraC. V. (Eds.), Cosmic perspectives. Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 205–229.
40.
KellyI. W.DeanG. A.SaklofskeD. H. (1990) Astrology: a critical review. In GrimP. (Ed.), Philosophy of science and the occult. (2nd ed.) Albany, NY: State Univer. of New York Press. Pp. 51–81.
KellyI. W.RottonJ.CulverR. B. (1986) The moon was full and nothing happened. Skeptical Inquirer, 10, 129–143.
43.
KurtzP.FraknoiA. (1985) Scientific tests of astrology do not support its claims. In FrazierK. (Ed.), Science confronts the paranormal. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 219–221.
44.
KurtzP.ZelenM.AbellG. (1980) The contradictions in Gauquelin's research: a rejoinder. Skeptical Inquirer, 4, 62–68.
45.
KurtzP.ZelenM.AbellG. (1981) Results of U.S. test of the “Mars effect.” In FrazierK. (Ed.), Paranormal borderlands of science. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 272–279.
46.
LeonardP. (1987) Childbirths and the full moon. David Dunlap Doings, 20(4), 7–8. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: David Dunlap Observatory, Univer. of Toronto.
47.
LieberA. L. (1978) The lunar effect: biological tides and human emotions. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
48.
LieberA. L.SherinC. R. (1972) Homicides and the lunar cycle: toward a theory of lunar influences on human emotional disturbance. American Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 69–74.
49.
MartensR.KellyI. W.SaklofskeD. H. (1988) Lunar phase and birthrate: a 50-year critical review. Psychological Reports, 63, 923–934.
50.
MayoJ.WhiteO.EysenckH. J. (1978) An empirical study of the relation between astrological factors and personality. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 229–236.
51.
McGerveyJ. D. (1981) A statistical test of sun-sign astrology. In FrazierK. (Ed.), Paranormal borderlands of science. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 235–240.
52.
MeeusJ. (1988) Doomsday: the May 2000 prediction. Skeptical Inquirer, 12, 290–292.
53.
RandiJ. (1982) Flim-flam!Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
54.
RawlinsD. (1977) What they aren't telling you: suppressed secrets of the psychic world, astrological universe, and Jeane Dixon. The Zetetic, 2, 62–83.
55.
ReverchonJ. (1971) Value of astrological judgements and forecasts. Yerres, France: Author.
SaklofskeD. H.KellyI. W.McKerracherD. W. (1982) An empirical study of personality and astrological factors. Journal of Psychology, 110, 275–280.
59.
SanduleakN. (1985) The moon is acquitted of murder in Cleveland. In FrazierK. (Ed.), Science confronts the paranormal. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 235–241.
60.
SilvermanB. I. (1971) Studies of astrology. Journal of Psychology, 77, 141–149.
61.
SmithersA. (1984) The zodiac test (Parts 1–4). Guardian, March 19–22, Manchester, England.
62.
SnyderC. R.LarsenD. L.BloomL. J. (1976) Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological and astrological assessment procedures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 258–265.
63.
StearnJ. (1972) A time for astrology. New York: New American Library.
64.
TysonG. A. (1984) An empirical test of the astrological theory of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 247–250.
65.
WedowS. M. (1976) The strangeness of astrology: an ethnography of credibility processes. In ArensW.MontagueS. P. (Eds.), The American dimension: cultural myths and social realities. Port Washington, NYAlfred.
66.
WestrumR. (1976) Scientists as experts: observations on “Objections to astrology.”The Zetetic, 1, 34–46.
