Preliminary normative data are presented for an experimental scale to assess credibility of personal injury claimants. The distinction between credibility and malingering and the need for credibility assessment in personal injury claims are discussed. Recommendations are made for use of the Credibility Scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnonJ. (1987) Detection of deception. Paper presented to American College of Forensic Psychology, Monterey, CA, May 1.
2.
CavanaughJ. L.RogersR. (1984) Malingering and deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2(1), 3.
3.
DillmanE. (1987) The necessary economic and vocational interface in personal injury cases. Journal of Private Sector Rehabilitation, 2, 121–142.
4.
DobbsD. B. (1985) Torts and compensation. St. Paul, MN: West.
LeavittF. (1985) Pain and deception: use of verbal pain measurement as a diagnostic aid in differentiating between clinical and simulated low-back pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 495–505.
10.
Lees-HaleyP. (1987) Proof of economic loss with LPE: disability, validity, and baloney. Journal of Private Sector Rehabilitation, 2, 191–199.
