The report of personal parapsychological experiences has been linked with the personality construct of fantasy proneness. It is possible that the factor of paranormal belief mediates this association. Certainly some data suggest that paranormal belief is conducive to the report of parapsychological experiences. This study examined the feasibility of the other facet of the issue, namely, that fantasy proneness facilitates paranormal belief. For a group of 92 adults a measure of fantasy proneness correlated significantly with belief in traditional religious concepts, psi, witchcraft, spiritualism, extraordinary life forms, and precognition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcockJ. E. (1981) Parapsychology: science or magic? A psychological perspective. Oxford, Eng.: Pergamon.
2.
CameronT.RollW. G. (1983) An investigation of apparitional experiences. Theta, 11, 74–78.
3.
CampbellJ. (1987) Cognition and the apparitional experience: an exploratory study. Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer. of New England, Armidale, Australia.
4.
CouncilJ. R.GreysonB. (1985, August) Near-death experiences and the “fantasy-prone” personality: preliminary findings. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
5.
CouncilJ. R.GreysonB.HuffK. D. (1986, August) Fantasy-proneness, hypnotizability, and reports of paranormal experiences. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association.
6.
HaightJ. (1979) Spontaneous psi cases: a survey and preliminary study of ESP, attitude, and personality relationships. Journal of Parapsychology, 43, 179–204.
7.
IrwinH. J. (1980) Out of the body Down Under: some cognitive characteristics of Australian students reporting OOBEs. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 50, 448–459.
8.
IrwinH. J. (1985a) Parapsychological phenomena and the absorption domain. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 79, 1–11.
9.
IrwinH. J. (1985b) A study of the measurement and the correlates of paranormal belief. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 79, 301–326.
10.
IrwinH. J. (1989) An introduction to parapsychology. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
11.
LynnS. J.RhueJ. W. (1988) Fantasy proneness: hypnosis, developmental antecedents, and psychopathology. American Psychologist, 43, 35–44.
12.
MurphyK.LesterD. (1976) A search for correlates of belief in ESP. Psychological Reports, 38, 82.
13.
MyersS. A. (1983) The Wilson-Barber Inventory of Childhood Memories and Imaginings: children's form and norms for 1337 children and adolescents. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7, 83–94.
14.
MyersS. A.AustrinH. R. (1985) Distal eidetic technology: further characteristics of the fantasy-prone personality. Journal of Mental Imagery, 9, 57–66.
15.
NadonR.KihlstromJ. F. (1987) Hypnosis, psi, and the psychology of anomalous experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 597–599.
16.
PalmerJ. (1971) Scoring in ESP tests as a function of belief in ESP: Part I. The sheep-goat effect. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 65, 373–408.
17.
RhueJ. W.LynnS. J. (1987) Fantasy proneness: developmental antecedents. Journal of Personality, 55, 121–137.
18.
RhueJ. W.LynnS. J. (1989) Fantasy proneness, hypnotizability, and absorption: a reexaminationInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 100–106.
19.
TobacykJ. J. (1988) A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. (Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana Tech Univer, Ruston, LA).
20.
TobacykJ.MilfordG. (1983) Belief in paranormal phenomena: assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029–1037.
21.
WilsonS. C.BarberT. X. (1983) The fantasy-prone personality: implications for understanding imagery, hypnosis, and parapsychological phenomena. In SheikhA. A. (Ed.), Imagery: current theory, research, and application. New York: Wiley. Pp. 340–387.
