This article provides the third section of a four-part update of an annotated bibliography of books, articles and chapters related to the psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat. This particular section lists some 123 references. The complete bibliography provides details of 596 references.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AustinD. A. (1985) Reinventing ourselves: The spiritual task of the nuclear age. Political Psychology, 6, 323–337.
2.
BialerS. (1985) The psychology of U.S.-Soviet relations. Political Psychology, 6, 263–273.
3.
BlightJ. G. (1988) Must the psychology of avoiding nuclear war remain free and insignificant?American Psychologist, 43, 326–329.
4.
BraithwaiteV. A.LawH. G. (1977) The structure of attitudes to doomsday issues. Australian Psychologist, 12, 167–174.
5.
de ManA. F. (1988) Early exposure to toxic radiation and violent death: A comment. Psychological Reports, 63, 870.
6.
ElderJ. H. (1965) A summary of research on reactions of children to nuclear war. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 35, 120–123.
7.
EriksonE. H. (1985) Pseudospeciation in the nuclear age. Political Psychology, 6, 213–217.
8.
FeshbachS.KandelE.HaistE. (1985) Attitudes toward nuclear armament policies: An example of social research in behalf of social advocacy. In OskampS. (Ed.), International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 107–126.
9.
FrenchC. C. (1984) Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: An annotated bibliography. Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 2, 247–273.
10.
FrenchC. C. (1989a) Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: Annotated bibliography update: I. A—F. Psychological Reports, 65, 403–425.
11.
FrenchC. C. (1989b) Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: Annotated bibliography update: II. G—L. Psychological Reports.
12.
FrenchC. C. (1990) Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: Annotated bibliography update: IV. S—Z. Psychological Reports, 65, 1099–1119.
13.
GellhornA. (1984) National security and the health of people: Human needs and the allocation of scarce resources. (Eighth International Conference on the Social Sciences and Medicine, 1983, Stirling, Scotland)Social Science and Medicine, 19, 307–315.
14.
IntriligatorM. D.BritoD. L. (1984) Can arms races lead to the outbreak of war?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28, 63–84.
15.
JanisI. L. (1985) International crisis management in the nuclear age. In OskampS. (Ed.), International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 63–86.
16.
LefcourtH. M. (1982) Locus of control. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
LernerM. J. (1965) The effect of preparatory action on beliefs concerning nuclear war. Journal of Social Psychology, 65, 225–231.
18.
LevensonH. (1981) Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In LefcourtH. M. (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 15–63.
19.
MackJ. E. (1985) Toward a collective psychopathology of the nuclear arms competition. Political Psychology, 6, 291–321.
20.
MaytonD. M. (1984, August) The Day After: A quasi-experimental study of its impact. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 257 697).
21.
MaytonD. M. (1987, August) Salience of the nuclear threat: Operationalization through spontaneous concern. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
22.
MorawskiJ.GoldsteinS. (1985) Psychology and nuclear war: A chapter in our legacy of social responsibility. American Psychologist, 40, 276–284.
23.
NevinJ. A. (1985) Behavior analysis, the nuclear arms race, and the peace movement. In OskampS. (Ed.), International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 27–44.
24.
OskampS. (1985) Introduction: Social psychology, international affairs, and public policy. In OskampS. (Ed.), International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 7–18.
25.
OskampS.KingJ. C.BurnS. M.KonradA. M.PollardJ. A.WhiteM. A. (1985) The media and nuclear war: Fallout from TV's “The Day After.” In OskampS. (Ed.), International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CASage Pp. 127–158.
26.
PellegriniR. J. (1988) Early-developmental exposure to nuclear fallout radiation: Interpretive considerations for epidemiological studies of violent death. Psychological Reports, 63, 857–858.
27.
SchmooklerA. B. (1985) U.S.-U.S.S.R.: Are we angling toward a shoot-out at the OK Corral?Political Psychology, 6, 275–290.
28.
SteinH. F. (1985) Psychological complementarity in Soviet-American relations. Political Psychology, 6, 249–261.
29.
WhiteR. K. (1985) Ten psychological contributions to the prevention of nuclear war. In OskampS. (Ed.), International conflict and national public policy issues. Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Pp. 45–61.
