The study examined the relationship between the amount of relevant or irrelevant information and subjects' strategies. Subjects solved 16 conjunctive concept-learning problems which varied in terms of the amount and type of information. The study measured the focusing strategy, the number of choices to solution, and the time to solution. Analysis indicated focusing scores were highest when the amount of information was lowest and relevant information was the source of the information. Other results suggest strategies developed over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BourneL. B.EkstrandB. R.DominowskiR. L. (1971) The psychology of thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
BulgarellaR.ArcherE. J. (1962) Concept identification of auditory stimuli as a function of amount of relevant and irrelevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 254–257.
3.
HaygoodR. C.BourneL. L. (1965) Attribute and rule-learning aspects of conceptual behavior. Psychological Review, 72, 175–195.
4.
LaughlinP. (1966) Selection strategies in concept attainment as a function of number of relevant problem attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 773–776.
5.
WalkerC. M.BourneL. E. (1961) Concept identification as a function of amount of relevant and irrelevant information. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 410–417.
