This study explores empirically the relationship between employees' cognitive preferences for different styles of creative problem-solving, as measured by the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI), and their actual behavior in relation to organizational change in a large industrial setting. The hypothesis that overt creativity, problem solving and decision-making behavior is modified in a large industrial setting (even though the underlying cognitive style preference remains intact) in a way that is predictable and observable, is supported and replicated across three work groups. The research design produces a matrix with cognitive style and actual behavior as its axes, constructed using the inventory, together with colleagues' ratings of behavior based on items from the same inventory. Implications for research into the situational influences affecting overt creative problem-solving behavior of individuals at work and organizational change and development are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportF. H. (1933) Institutional behavior. Chapel Hill, NC: Univer. of North Carolina Press.
2.
AllportF. H. (1934) The J-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 141–183.
3.
BakkeE. W. (1965) Concept of the social organization. In HaireM. (Ed.), Modern organization theory. New York: Wiley. Pp. 16–75.
4.
BasadurM.FinkbeinerC. T. (1985) Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 37–49.
5.
CarneG. C.KirtonM. J. (1982) Styles of creativity, test-score correlations between the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 50, 31–36.
6.
CookM. (1979) Perceiving others. London: Methuen.
7.
De BonoE. (1970) Lateral thinking. Middlesex, Eng.: Penguin.
8.
DruckerP. F. (1969) Management's new role. Harvard Business Review, 47(6), 49–54.
9.
EkvallG. (1982) Creative problem-solving in product development—a comparative study. Internal Report, Swedish Council for Management and Organizational Behavior.
10.
EttlieJ. E.O'KeefeR. (1983) Innovative attitudes, values and intentions in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 163–182.
11.
ForehandG. A.GilmerB. von. (1964) Environmental variations in studies of organizational climate. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 361–382.
12.
GodwinW. F.RestleF. (1974) The road to agreement: Sub-group pressures on small group consensus processes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 30, 500–509.
13.
GoldsmithR. E. (1984) Personality characteristics: Association with adaption-innovation. Journal of Psychology, 117, 159–165.
14.
GoldsmithR. E. (1985) A factorial composition of the KAI Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 245–250.
15.
GoldsmithR. E.MatherlyT. A. (1986) The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory: Faking and social desirability: Replication and extension. Psychological Reports, 58, 269–270.
16.
GoldsmithR. E.MatherlyT. A. (1987) Adaption/innovation and creativity: A replication and extension. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 79–82.
17.
GoldsteinK. M.BlackmanS. (1978) Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research. New York: Wiley.
18.
GoodenoughD. R. (1985) Styles of cognitive personality functioning. In BernardinH. J.BournasD. A. (Eds.), Personality assessment in organizations. New York: Praeger. Pp. 217–235.
19.
GordonW. J. J. (1961) Synectics: The development of creative capacity. London: Harper & Row.
20.
GryskiewiczS. S. (1982) Creative leadership development and the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Unpublished paper presented at British Psychological Society Conference.
21.
GryskiewiczS. S.HillsD. W.HillsK. (1986) Understanding managerial creativity: The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and other assessment measures. Report from Centre for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
22.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.
23.
HarmonH. H. (1967) Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
24.
HaywoodG.EverettC. (1983) Adaptors and innovators: Data from the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory in a local authority setting. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 339–342.
25.
JamesL. R.JonesA. P. (1974) Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096–1112.
26.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978) The social psychology of organizations. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
27.
KellerR. T.HollandW. E. (1978) A cross-validation study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory in three research and development organizations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 563–570.
28.
KirtonM. J. (1976) Adaption and innovation: A description on measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.
29.
KirtonM. J. (1980) Adaptors and innovators in organizations. Human Relations, 33, 213–224.
30.
KirtonM. J. (1984) Adaptors and innovators: Why new initiatives get blocked. Long Range Planning, 17, 137–143.
31.
KirtonM. J. (1987) Adaptors and innovators: Cognitive style and personality. In IsaksenS. G. (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. Buffalo, NY: Brearly, Ltd. Pp. 282–304. (a).
32.
KirtonM. J. (1987) Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI)—manual. (2nd ed.) Hatfield, Herts: Occupational Research Centre.
33.
KirtonM. J.De CiantisS. M. (1986) Cognitive style and personality: The Kirton Adaption-Innovation and Cattell's Sixteen Personality Factor Inventories. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 141–146.
34.
KirtonM. J.McCarthyR. M. (1988) Cognitive climate and organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 175–184.
35.
KirtonM. J.PenderS. R. (1982) The adaption-innovation continuum, occupational type and course selection. Psychological Reports, 51, 883–886.
36.
KuhnT. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
37.
LewinK. (1936) Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
LindsayP. (1984) Counselling to resolve a clash of cognitive styles. Technovation, 3, 57–67.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
41.
McGregorD. (1967) The professional manager. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
McHaleJ.FlegD. (1985) How Calamity Jane was put in her place. Transition, November, 14–16.
43.
MertonR. K. (1957) (Ed.) Social theory and social structures. New York: Free Press of Glenco.
44.
MessickS. (1976) Individuality in learning. London: Jossey-Bass.
45.
MurrayH. A. (1938) Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
46.
NorusisM. J. (1986) SPSS/PC + for the IBM PC/XT/AT. New York: McGraw-Hill. B117–B129.
47.
NunnallyJ. C. (1981) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
OsbornA. F. (1957) Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
49.
O'TooleJ. J. (1979) Corporate and managerial cultures. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Problems in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 7–28.
50.
ParnesS. J. (1967) Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Scribner.
51.
PayneR. L.PughD. S. (1976) Organizational structure and climate. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Pp. 1125–1172.
52.
PrevidePrato G.MassiminiF. (1984) Adattori-Innovatori: Una teoria de una misura della creativita nelle. Richerche de Psicologia, 3, 99–134.
53.
PreworskiA.TeuneM. (1970) The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
54.
RickardsT. (1985) Stimulation innovation—a systems approach. London: Frances Pinter.
55.
RobeyD.TaggartW. (1981) Measuring managers' minds: The assessment of style in human information processing. Academy of Management Journal, 6, 375–383.
56.
RogersC. R. (1959) Towards a theory of creativity. In AndersonH. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation. New York: Harper.
57.
SchneiderB. (1985) Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 573–611.
58.
SteinM. I. (1975) Stimulating creativity. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.
