Abstract
Although we are indisputably capable of changing our beliefs, everyday experience suggests that such changes are hard to make: we often cling to old and familiar conceptions of reality, disregarding or explaining away contradictory evidence. This report presents a new experimental paradigm for the study of this critically important human attribute. Preliminary qualitative observations indicate that conceptual conservatism can be directly explored in a controlled laboratory setting, that it plays a more critical role in human affairs than has been hitherto supposed, and that it is traceable in part to the cognitive difficulty of replacing one belief with another.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
