One version of an orthodox rationale for psychological studies of functional hemispheric asymmetry is sketched out. This rationale emphasizes the significance of asymmetry for a psychological taxonomy. An alternative rationale is then presented. This is that the arrangement of the hemispheres with their commissures permits mapping between hemispheres. This mapping may underlie human capacities such as abstraction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BremerF.BridhayeJ.Andre-BalisauxG. (1956) Physiologie et pathologie du corps calleux. Archives Suisses de Neurologie et Psychiatrie, 78, 31–87.
2.
CummingW. J. K. (1970) An anatomical review of the corpus callosum. Cortex, 6, 1–18.
3.
HebbD. O. (1966) A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
4.
KoestlerA. (1964) The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.
5.
MarshallJ. (1973a) Language, learning and laterality. In HindeR. A.HindeJ. S. (Eds.), Constraints on learning. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 445–456.
6.
MarshallJ. (1973b) Some problems and paradoxes associated with recent accounts of hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia, 11, 463–470.
7.
NebesR. D. (1974) Hemispheric specialization in commissurotomized man. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1–14.
8.
YoungR. M. (1970) Mind, brain and adaptation in the nineteenth century: Cerebral localization and its biological context from Call to Ferrier. Oxford, Eng.: Clarendon.
9.
ZangwillO. L. (1974) Consciousness and the cerebral hemispheres. In DimondS. J.BeaumontJ. G. (Eds.), Hemisphere function in the human brain. London: Elek Science. Pp. 264–268.
