117 college students were either told or not told in advance the thesis of a satire ridiculing the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent to murder. Subjects were then asked whether they agreed with the statement that capital punishment is a deterrent to murder. Those not told the thesis in advance were also asked to identify which of five statements was the thesis. There may be a relationship between knowing a satire's thesis in advance and the persuasiveness of that satire. There also seems to be an association between perceiving a thesis while reading it and the satire's persuasiveness. The results tend to support those of prior studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GrunerC. R. (1972, December) Satire as a reinforcer of attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA. (Available from the author).
2.
GrunerC. R. (1978) Under Handing laughter: the workings of wit and humor. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
3.
GrunerC. R. (1979) Dogmatism, intelligence, and the understanding/appreciation of editorial satire. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Humor, Los Angeles, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 178 981).
