This study tested the hypothesis that “reciprocal leniency” moderated the relationship between Consideration scores on the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire—Form XII and performance ratings. Reciprocal leniency was defined as a response style in which scores on the questionnaire are affected by harsh, lenient, or fair ratings made by the supervisor. Results partially supported the hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernardinH. J.BeattyR. W. (1984) Performance appraisal: assessing human behavior at work. Boston, MA: Kent-Wadsworth.
2.
EdwardsA. L. (1970) The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3.
FleishmanE. A. (1973) Twenty years of consideration and structure. In FleishmanE. A.HuntJ. G. (Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Univer. Press. Pp. 1–37.
4.
FleishmanE. A.PetersD. R. (1962) Interpersonal values, leadership attitudes, and managerial success. Personnel Psychology, 15, 127–143.
5.
GuionR. M.Personnel testing. (1965) New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
IlgenD. R.FujiiD. S. (1978) An investigation of the validity of leader behavior descriptions obtained from subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 642–651.
7.
KerrS.SchriesheimC. A. (1974) Consideration, initiating structure, and organizational criteria—an update of Korman's 1966 review. Personnel Psychology, 27, 558–568.
8.
LordR. G.BinningJ. F.RushM. C.ThomasJ. C. (1978) The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 27–39.
9.
MitchellT. R.LarsonJ. R.Jr.GreenS. G. (1977) Leader behavior, situational moderators, and group performance: an attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977, 18, 254–268.
10.
NunnallyJ. C. (1967) Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
O'ReillyC. A.RobertsK. H. (1978) Supervisor influence and subordinate mobility aspirations as moderators of consideration and initiating structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 96–102.
12.
RushM. C.ThomasJ. C.LordR. G. (1977) Implicit leadership theory: a potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 95–110.
13.
SchriesheimC. A.DeNisiA. S. (1978) The impact of implicit theories on the validity of questionnaires. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
14.
SchriesheimC. A.HouseR. J.KerrS. (1976) Leader initiating structure: a reconciliation of discrepant research results and some empirical tests. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 297–321.
15.
SchriesheimC. A.KerrS. (1974) Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 756–765.
16.
SchriesheimC. A.KerrS. (1977) Theories and measures of leadership: a ethical appraisal of current and future directions. In HuntJ. G.LarsonL. L. (Eds.), Leadership: the cutting edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Univer. Press.
17.
SchriesheimC. A.KinickiA. K.SchriesheimJ. F. (1979) The effect of leniency on leader behavior descriptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 1–29.
18.
StogdillR. M. (1963) Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire: Form XII. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State Univer.
