Two studies of yeasaying are reported. Data from 36 college students supported the hypothesis that scores on a yeasaying measure would be positively correlated (.58) with a measure of dogmatism. Data from 133 college students confirmed that yeasaying is moderately correlated with “true” responses to socially undesirable items (−.38) and that social desirability and faking are positively correlated (.53). Yeasaying was also positively correlated with extraversion (.35) and neuroticism (.31).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CouchA.KenistonK.Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 151–174.
2.
CronbachL.Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1946, 6, 475–494.
3.
EysenckH. J.A short questionnaire for the measurement of two dimensions of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1958, 42, 14–17.
4.
EysenckS. B. G.EysenckH. J.An experimental investigation of ‘desirability’ response set in a personality questionnaire. Life Sciences, 1963, 2, 343–355.
5.
FarleyF. H.Social desirability, extraversion and neuroticism: a learning analysis. Journal of Psychology, 1966, 64, 113–118.
6.
GreenwaldH. J.ClausenJ. D.Test of relationship between yeasaying and social desirability. Psychological Reports, 1970, 27, 139–141.
7.
HandJ.Measurement of response sets. Psychological Reports, 1964, 14, 907–913.
8.
HandJ.BrazzellC. O.Contamination in measures of acquiescence and social desirability. Psychological Reports, 1965, 16, 759–760.
9.
HundlebyJ. D.The construct validity of a scale of acquiescence. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1966, 5, 290–298.
10.
KirtonM. J.Characteristics of high lie scorers. Psychological Reports, 1977, 40, 279–280.
11.
MartinJ.Acquiescence—measurement and theory. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1964, 3, 216–225.
12.
RayJ. J.The development and validation of a balanced dogmatism scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1970, 22, 253–260.
13.
RayJ. J.Alternatives to the F scale in the measurement of authoritarianism: a catalogue. Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 122, 105–119.
SolomonL.KleinE.The relationship between agreeing response set and social desirability. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 176–179.
16.
StockingC.Reinterpreting the Marlowe-Crowne scale. In BradburnN. M.SudmanS. (Eds.), Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1979. Pp. 85–106.
17.
StrahanR.GerbasiK. C.Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1972, 28, 191–193.
18.
TaylorJ. B.The ‘yeasayer’ and social desirability: a comment on the Couch and Keniston paper. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 172.
19.
TroldahlV.PowellF.A short form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 1965, 44, 211–214.
20.
WellsW. D.The influence of yeasaying response style. Journal of Advertising Research, 1961, 1, 1–12.
