The persuasive efficacy of a model's physical attractiveness is examined, using both correlational and structural evidence. Attractive models apparently induce greater compliance by mediating receivers' perceptual processes; receivers initially form cognitive judgments of models based on their (logically unrelated) attractiveness and, in turn, use these judgments as the basis for assessing the persuasiveness of the message the models present. Compliance, although based nominally on rational evaluation of a message, appears to be modified significantly by a beautiful-is-better assessment of the message's presenter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronsonE.The social animal. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1972.
2.
ChaikenS.Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 752–766.
3.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD.LISREL VI—Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. (3rd ed.) Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, 1984.
4.
MillerA. G.Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 241–243.
5.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown, 1981.
6.
SigallH.AronsonE.Liking for an evaluator as a function of her physical attractiveness and nature of the evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 93–100.
7.
SnyderM.TanksE. D.BerscheidE.Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 656–666.
