Repeating a famous old experiment shows rats do learn the location of food when thirsty, even in a T-maze design which provides reward with water in the opposite arm. Moreover, they learn it on the first trial. They then “forget” it when given more training trials. The experiment argues against the practice of habituation and shows that anticipatory-goal responses cannot explain maze results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertD. J.MahC. J. (1972) Conditioned reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 3, 369–388.
2.
AmselA. (1962) Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning. Psychological Review, 69, 306–328.
3.
BerlyneD. E.SlaterJ. (1957) Perceptual curiosity, exploratory behavior, and maze learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 50, 228–232.
4.
BollesR. C. (1979) Learning theory. New York: Holt.
5.
CapaldiE. D.HovancikJ. R.DavidsonT. L. (1979) Learning about water by hungry rats. Learning and Motivation, 10, 58–72.
6.
CapaldiE. D.SmithN. S.HovancikJ. R. (1977) Reversal learning as a function of changed reward location or changed drive. Learning and Motivation, 8, 98–112.
7.
CapaldiE. D.ViveirosD. M.DavidsonT. L. (1981) Deprivation stimulus intensity and incentive factors in the control of instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 140–149.
8.
ChristieR. (1951) The role of drive discrimination in learning under irrelevant motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 13–19.
9.
FehrerE. (1951) Latent learning in the sophisticated rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 409–416.
10.
GriceG. R. (1948) An experimental test of the expectation theory of learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41, 137–143.
11.
HonzikC. H. (1930) Insight in rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4,215–232.
12.
HullC. L. (1933) Differential habituation to internal stimuli in the albino rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 16, 255–273.
13.
HullC. L. (1952) A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale Univer. Press.
14.
KendlerH. H. (1947) An investigation of latent learning in a T-maze. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 40, 265–270.
15.
KendlerH. H.KannerJ. H. (1950) A further test of the ability of rats to learn the location of food when motivated by thirst. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 762–765.
16.
KendlerH. H.LevineS. (1953) A more sensitive test of irrelevant-incentive learning under conditions of satiation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 46, 271–273.
17.
KendlerH. H.MencherH. D. (1948) The ability of rats to learn the location of food when motivated by thirst. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 82–88.
18.
KimbleG. A. (1961) Hilgard and Marquis' ‘Conditioning and learning.’New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19.
McAllisterW. R. (1952) The spatial relation of irrelevant and relevant goal objects as a factor in simple selective learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45, 531–537.
20.
MeehlP. E.MacCorquodaleK. (1948) A further study of latent learning in the T-maze. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41, 372–396.
21.
ShiffrinR. M.SchneiderW. (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
22.
SpenceK. W. (1950) Cognitive vs. stimulus-response theories of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 159–172.
23.
SpenceK. W.LippittR. A. (1946) An experimental test of the sign-Gestalt theory of trial-and-error. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 491–502.
24.
ThistlethwaiteD. (1952) Conditions of irrelevant-incentive learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45, 517–525.
25.
ThompsonW. R.SolomonI. M. (1954) Spontaneous pattern discrimination in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 104–107.
26.
WalkerE. J.KnotterM. C.DeValoisR. J. (1950) Drive specificity and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 161–168.
