Two social psychological theories—similarity theory and equity theory—are employed to elucidate the relationship between group members' abilities and group performance on tasks involving high interdependence. Contrasting hypotheses are drawn regarding compositions of specific abilities which should evoke performance above or below the simple sum of individual members' capacities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. S. (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 267–299.
2.
CummingsT. G. (1978) Sociotechnical experimentation: A review of sixteen studies. In PasmoreW. A.SherwoodJ. J. (Eds.), Sociotechnical systems: A sourcebook. San Diego, IL: University Associates. Pp. 259–270.
3.
DyerW. G. (1977) Teambuilding: Issues and alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
EgerbladhT. (1976) The function of group size and ability level in solving a multidimensional complementary task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 805–808.
5.
GoldmanM. (1965) A comparison of individual and group performance for varying combinations of initial ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 210–216.
6.
GuionR. M. (1983) Recruiting, selection, and placement. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally. Pp. 777–828.
7.
HackmanR. J.MorrisC. G. (1983) Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness. In BlumbergH. H.HareA. P.KentV.DaviesM. P. (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction. New York: Wiley. Pp. 331–346.
8.
HatfieldE. (1983) Equity theory and research: An overview. In BlumbergH. H.HareA. P.KentV.DaviesM. P. (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction. New York: Wiley. Pp. 401–412.
9.
HillG. W. (1982) Group versus individual performance: Are n+1 heads better than one?Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517–539.
10.
HoffmanL. R.MarierR. F. (1961) Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401–407.
11.
JohnsonH. H.TorciviaJ. M. (1967) Group and individual performance on a single task as a function of distribution of individual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 266–273.
12.
KerrN. L. (1983) Motivation losses in small group: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–828.
13.
LaughlinP. R.JohnsonH. H. (1966) Group and individual performance on a complementary task as a function of initial level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 407–414.
14.
MowdayR. T. (1979) Equity theory predictions of behavior in organization. In SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 124–145.
15.
NahemowL.LawtonN. P. (1983) Similarity and propinquity: Making friends with “different” people. In BlumbergH. H.HareA. P.KentV.DaviesM. P. (Ed.), Small groups and social interaction. New York: Wiley. Pp. 279–292.
16.
O'BrienG. E. (1984) Group productivity. In GruenbergM.WallT. (Eds.), Social psychology and organizational behavior. New York: Wiley. Pp. 37–70.
17.
RohrbaughJ. (1981) Improving the quality of group judgement: Social judgement analysis and the nominal group technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 272–288.
18.
SecordP. F.BackmanC. W. (1974) Social psychology. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
SennD. J. (1971) Attraction as a function of similarity-dissimilarity in task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 120–123.
20.
ShawM. E. (1976) Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (1979) Motivation and work behavior. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
SteinerI. V. (1972) Croup process and productivity. New York: Academic press.
23.
SzilagyiA. D.WallaceM. Y. (1982) Organizational behavior and performance. (3rd ed.) Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
24.
TerborgJ. R.CastoreC.DeNinnoJ. A. (1976) A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition as group performance and cohesion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 782–790.
25.
TzinerA. (1982) Differential effects of group cohesiveness types: A clarifying overview. Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 227–240.
26.
TzinerA.EdenD (1985) Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts?Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 85–93.
