To study the relationship between the Bem-Spence categorical method of scoring androgyny and a number of continuous methods, Bem's Masculinity and Femininity scores were simulated for 50 studies of 200 subjects each. The continuous methods relate closely to one another and leave between 64% and 71% of the variance in the categorical method unaccounted for. There is little evidence for choosing one method over another. Research is needed to compare the predictions of the median-split method with those of the continuous methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BemS. L.On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
BobkoP.SchwartzJ. P.A metric for integrating theoretically related but statistically uncorrelated constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1984, 48, 11–16.
4.
BryanL.ColemanM.GanongL.Geometric mean as a continuous measure of androgyny. Psychological Reports, 1981, 48, 691–694.
5.
HarringtonD. M.AndersenS. M.Creativity, masculinity, femininity, and three models of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41, 744–757.
6.
HeilbrunA. B.PitmanD.Testing some assumptions about psychological androgyny. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1979, 135, 175–188.
7.
KalinR.Method for scoring androgyny as a continuous variable. Psychological Reports, 1979, 44, 1205–1206.
8.
LubinskiD.TellegenA.ButcherJ., The relationship between androgyny and subjective indicators of emotional well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 722–730.
9.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L.StappJ.Ratings of self and peers on self-role attributes and their relations to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
10.
StrahanR. F.Remarks on scoring androgyny as a single continuous variable. Psychological Reports, 1981, 49, 887–890.
