The behavior of subjects in a human operant conditioning experiment was “shaped” using a random reinforcement contingency. Bar-press responses kept a moving cursor near a target although the consequence of each response was a random change in the direction of the cursor. The apparent effect of reinforcement on behavior is shown to be an illusion created by ignoring the consistency of behavioral results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KoshlandD. E.Behavioral chemotaxis as a model behavioral system. New York: Raven, 1980.
2.
MarkenR.Intentional and accidental behavior: A control theory analysis. Psychological Reports, 1982, 50, 647–650.
3.
MarkenR.Mind reading: A look at changing intentions. Psychological Reports, 1983, 53, 267–270.
4.
PowersW. T.Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1973.
5.
PowersW. T.Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 417–435.
6.
PowersW. T.The nature of robots: Looking for controlled variables. Byte, 1979, 4, 96–112.
7.
SkinnerB. F.Selection by consequences. Science, 1981, 213, 501–504.
8.
WeinerN.Cybernetics: Control and communication in animal and machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1948.
