This 3 × 3 study (with one cell missing) examined the effectiveness of goal setting (participative, assigned, and no goals) and financial incentives (noncontingent, piece rate, and goal contingent) as techniques to stimulate learning 88 inexperienced trainees performed a 10-hr., 5-day proofreading proficiency task in a laboratory setting. The linear trends for all groups except the control group in which noncontingent ($30 for completing the training period) pay was offered were significant. Planned comparisons indicated that learning was greatest when a performance goal was assigned and a financial incentive offered for demonstrating that level of performance. The offer of piece-rate reinforcement also stimulated faster learning than the offer of noncontingent pay. Setting goals, regardless of the method, did not result in significant performance increases beyond that achieved by offering a $30 incentive for merely completing the training. Finally, financial incentives affected goal choice. Implications for training programs were discussed.
BazermanM.Impact of personal control on performance: Is added control always beneficial?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 61, 472–479.
3.
BergerC.CummingsL.HenemanH.Expectancy theory and operation conditioning predictions of performing under variable ratio and continuous schedules of reinforcement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 14, 227–240.
4.
BlumM. L.NaylorJ. C.Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundations. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
CampbellD. J.The effects of goal-contingent payment on the performance of a complex task. Personnel Psychology, 1984, 37, 23–40.
7.
GoldsteinI. L.Training: Program development and evaluation. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1974.
8.
HilgardE. R.BowerG. H.Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975.
9.
IvancevichJ. M.Effects of goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 605–612.
10.
IvancevichJ. M.McMahonJ. T.The effects of goal setting, external feedback, and self-generated feedback on outcome variables: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 23, 359–372.
11.
KimJ. S.HammerW. C.Effect of performance feedback and goal setting on productivity and satisfaction in an organizational setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 48–57.
12.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A.Increasing productivity with decreasing time limits: A field replication of Parkinson's law. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 524–526.
13.
LathamG. P.MarshallH. A.The effects of self set, participatively set, and assigned goals on the performance of government employees. Personnel Psychology, 1982, 35, 399–404.
14.
LathamG. P.SaariL. M.The effects of holding goal difficulty constant on assigned and participatively-set goals. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 163–168.
15.
LathamG. P.SteeleT. P.The motivational effects of participation versus goal setting on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 24, 406–417.
16.
LathamG. P.SteeleT. P.SaariL. M.The effects of participation and goal difficulty on performance. Personnel Psychology, 1982, 35, 677–686.
17.
LathamG. P.YuklG. A.Applied versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated wood workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 299–307.
18.
LathamG. P.YuklG. A.Effects of assigned and participative goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 166–171.
19.
LawlerE. E.Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
20.
LindmanH. R.Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs. San Francisco, CA: Freeman, 1974.
21.
LockeE. A.Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1968, 3, 157–189.
22.
LockeE. A.BryanJ. F.KendallL. M.Goal and intentions as mediators of the effects of monetary incentives on behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1958, 52, 104–121.
23.
LockeE. A.SchweigerD. M.Participation in decision-making: One more look. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior. Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979.
LuthansF.PaulR.BakerD.An experimental analysis of the impact of contingent reinforcement on salesperson's performance behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 314–323.
26.
MarxM. H.BunchM. E.Fundamentals and applications of learning. New York: Macmillan, 1977.
27.
McCallR. B.AppelbaumR. S.Bias in the analysis of repeated measures of design: Some alternative approaches. Child Development, 1973, 44, 401–415.
28.
MowenJ. C.MiddlemistR. D.LutherD.Joint effects of assigned goal level and incentive structure on task performance: A laboratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 598–603.
29.
OrganD. W.HammerW. C.Organizational behavior. Piano, TX: Business Publ., 1982.
30.
PritchardR.CurtisM. I.The influence of goal setting and financial incentives on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 10, 175–183.
31.
TerborgJ. R.MillerH.Motivational behavior and performance: A closer examination of goal setting and monetary incentives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 29–39.
32.
WexleyK. N.LathamG. P.Developing and training human resources in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1982.
33.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
34.
YuklG.WexleyK.SeymoreJ.Effectiveness of pay incentives under variable ratio and continuous reinforcement schedules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 19–23.
