Treating attributional consistency as repeated measures, attributional reversals were produced when subjects were given a second opportunity to attribute to behavior whose duration exceeded appropriate time limits. Results are discussed in terms of the observer's expectancy of the actor's behavior and an extension of Kelley's (1967) analysis-of-variance formulation of attribution is offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KelleyH. H.Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (1967). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967. Pp. 192–238.
2.
KelleyH. H.The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 107–128.
3.
MajorB.Information acquisition and attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 1010–1023.
4.
McArthurL. Z.The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 171–193.
5.
MillerD.PorterC.Effects of temporal perspective on the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 532–541.
6.
MooreB.SherrodD.LiuJ.UnderwoodB.The dispositional shift in attribution over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979, 15, 553–569.
7.
SchwartzS.FishbeinM. J.Attributional flip-flops. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Minneapolis, May, 1982.
8.
WoukH.The Caine mutiny. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1951.
