Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mildly mentally retarded and nonretarded students (age range: 10 to 16 yr.), classified by groups according to low suggestibility, were exposed to positive, negative, or neutral suggestions concerning their performance on a paired-associate learning task. A split-plot design assessed interactions between variables of subjects' category and suggestibility and treatment conditions, such as suggestion provided and trials. Analyses of variance showed retarded students improved more. The data also suggested somewhat improved performance by subjects given a positive suggestion. The suggestibility of many retarded students may be used by trainers to facilitate faster learning of simple tasks, especially if positive performance suggestions are employed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailer

Conceptualization of success and failure in mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Personality, 1961, 29, 303–320.

Barber

T. X.

Calverly

D. S.

Comparative effects of “hypnotic-like” suggestibility of recorded and spoken suggestions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964, 28, 384–391.

Baumeister

A. A.

Kellas

Process variables in paired associate learning. In Ellis

N. R.

(Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 221–226.

Clark

Ruiter

Task difficulty and task performance in autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1979, 20, 271–285.

Koegel

R. L.

Rincover

Egel

A. L.

Educating and understanding autistic children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1982.

Krippner

The use of hypnosis and the improvement of academic achievement. Journal of Special Education, 1970, 4, 451–459.

Macmillan

D. L.

Effect of experimental success and failure on the situational expectancy of EMR and nonretarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975, 80, 90–95.

Parker

P. D.

Barber

T. X.

Hypnosis, task-motivating instructions, and learning performance. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 499–504.

Prehm

H. J.

Mayfield

Paired-associate learning and retention in retarded and nonretarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1970, 74, 622–626.

10.

Ringelheim

The effect of failure on verbal expectancies in male defectives. Abstracts of Peabody Studies in Mental Retardation, 1960, 1, No. 14.

11.

Rodda

Language and language disordered children. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1977, 30, 139–145.

12.

Rotter

J. B.

Some implications of a social learning theory for the prediction of goal-directed behavior from testing procedures. Psychological Review, 1960, 67, 301–316.

13.

Starkman

S. S.

Cromwell

R. L.

Self-evaluation of performance and subsequent practice effects in mental defectives. Psychological Reports, 1958, 4, 414.

14.

Stevens

H. A.

Heber

Mental retardation. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1964.

15.

Trippi

J. A.

Special class placement and suggestibility of mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 220–222.

16.

Weitzenhoffer

A. M.

Hilgard

E. R.

Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1959.

17.

Zigler

Motivational determinants in the performance of retarded children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1966, 36, 848–856.

Effects of Suggestibility on Learning by Retarded and Nonretarded Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References