The present study used 13 male, hooded rats in a within-subjects design to test the hypothesis that a modified avoidance-avoidance conflict situation in a discrimination learning task would evoke a more intense auditory startle reaction than would the absence of such conflict. The presumed mechanism was an increase in drive or arousal, as a consequence of the conflict, resulting in greater startle. The findings were inconsistent with the hypothesis; the startle reactions of animals in a conflict situation were not different from those of animals in a non-conflict situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonD. C.JohnsonD.KemptonH.Second-order fear conditioning as revealed through augmentation of a startle response: Part i. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 16, 5–7. (a).
2.
AndersonD. C.JohnsonD.KemptonH.Second-order fear conditioning as revealed through augmentation of a startle response: Part II. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 16, 7–9. (b).
3.
AndersonD. C.SergioJ. P.EwingM.Food deprivation and startle magnitude: Inhibition, potentiation, or neither?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1982, 19, 165–168.
4.
ArmusH. L.CarlsonK. R.GuinanJ. F.CrowellR. A.Effect of a secondary reinforcement stimulus on the auditory startle response. Psychological Reports, 1964, 14, 535–540.
BachmannR. F.ArmusH. L.Effect of avoidance-avoidance conflict on startle magnitude. Psychological Reports, 1970, 26, 363–367.
7.
BrownJ. S.FarberI. E.Emotions conceptualized as intervening variables—with suggestions toward a theory of frustration. Psychological Bulletin, 1951, 48, 465–495.
8.
BrownJ. S.KalishH. I.FarberI. E.Conditioned fear as revealed by magnitude of startle response to an auditory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951, 41, 317–328.
9.
ChiC. C.The effect of amobarbital sodium on conditioned fear as measured by the potentiated startle response in rats. Psychopharmacologia, 1965, 7, 115–122.
10.
DavisM.AstrachanD. I.Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: Effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978, 4, 95–103.
11.
FechterL. D.IsonJ. R.The inhibition of the acoustic startle reaction in rats by food and water deprivation. Learning and Motivation, 1972, 3, 109–124.
12.
FingerF. W.Quantitative studies of “conflict:” I. Variations in latency and strength of the rat's response in a discrimination-jumping situation. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1941, 31, 97–127.
13.
GuinanJ. F.The effect of conflict on the magnitude of startle response. Unpublished Master's thesis, The Univer. of Toledo., 1962.
14.
IsonJ. R.KrauterE. E.Acoustic startle reflexes in the rat during consummatory behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975, 89, 39–49.
15.
KurtzK. H.SiegelA.Conditioned fear and magnitude of startle response: A replication and extension. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966, 62, 8–14.
16.
MellgrenR. L.Magnitude of the startle response and drive level. Psychological Reports, 1969, 25, 187–193.
