An experiment was conducted to determine whether a group contingency could enhance the effectiveness of self-delivered reinforcement in boosting the productivity of 10 severely retarded clients in a work activity center. An ABAC reversal design showed that self-delivered reinforcement significantly increased productivity above baseline levels. Moreover, the addition of a group contingency seemed to render self-delivered reinforcement more effective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellamyG. T.HornerR. H.InmanD. P.Vocational habilitation of severely retarded adults. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979.
HellandC. D.PaluckR. J.KleinM.A comparison of self- and external reinforcement with the trainable mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, 1976, 14, 22–23.
4.
KazdinA. E.MatsonJ. L.Social validation in mental retardation. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 1981, 2, 39–53.
5.
LutzkerJ. R.White-BlackburnG.The good productivity game: increasing work performance in a rehabilitation setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979, 12, 488.
6.
RuschF. R.MithaugD. E.Vocational training for mentally retarded adults. Champaign: Research Press, 1980.
7.
WehmanP.Competitive employment. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1981.
8.
WehmanP.SchutzR.BatesP.RenzagliaA.KaranO.Self-management programmes with mentally retarded workers: implications for developing independent vocational behaviour. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 17, 57–64.
