A number of recent textbooks have claimed that the American psychologist E. B. Twitmyer discovered the conditioned reflex in 1902 independently of and even prior to Pavlov. Various explanations for the obscurity of Twitmyer's discovery were offered. However, closer scrutiny of Twitmyer's publications, viewed in their contemporary context, does not find much support for such speculative explanations. It is argued that Twitmyer's work with the knee jerk constituted neither a knowing nor an unknowing discovery of the “conditioned reflex.” Instead a retrospective and anachronistic view of history, employing an overly simple notion of discovery and a reified concept of the conditioned reflex, had discovered Twitmyer in order to teach some “lessons from history.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgassiJ.Toward an historiography of science. History and theory, Beiheft 2. The Hague: Mouton, 1963.
2.
BelcherD. M.Giving psychology away. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
3.
BowditchH. P.WarrenJ. W.The knee-jerk and its physiological modifications. Journal of Physiology, 1890, 11, 25–64.
4.
BurnhamW. H.The normal mind. New York: Appleton, 1924.
5.
ButterfieldH.The Whig interpretation of history. New York: Scribners, 1951.
6.
CasonH.The conditioned reflex or conditioned response as a common activity of living organisms. Psychological Bulletin, 1925, 22, 445–472.
7.
ColemanS. R.GormezanoI.Classical conditioning and the “law of effect:” historical and empirical assessment. Behaviorism, 1979, 7, 1–33.
8.
CoonD.Introduction to psychology: exploration and application. (2nd ed.) New York: West, 1980.
9.
CoonD.Eponymy, obscurity, Twitmyer, and Pavlov. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1982, 18, 255–262.
10.
DallenbachK. M.Twitmyer and the conditioned response. American Journal of Psychology, 1959, 72, 633–638.
11.
DodgeR.Elementary conditions of human variability. New York: Columbia Univer. Press, 1927.
12.
FearingF.A critique of the experimental studies of cortical inhibition with special reference to the knee jerk. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1927, 7, 285–296.
13.
FearingF.The history of the experimental study of the knee-jerk. American Journal of Psychology, 1928, 40, 92–111.
14.
GormezanoI.KehoeE. J.Classical conditioning and the law of contiguity. In HarzernP.ZeilerM. D. (Eds.), Predictability, correlation, and contiguity. New York: Wiley, 1981. Pp. 1–45.
15.
HesseM.Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univer. Press, 1980.
16.
HilgardE. R.MarquisD. G.Conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton-Century, 1940.
17.
HymanR.The nature of psychological inquiry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
18.
IrwinF. W.Edwin Burket Twitmyer: 1873–1943. American Journal of Psychology, 1943, 56, 451–453.
19.
JamesW.The principles of psychology. (2 vols.) New York: Holt, 1890.
LombardW. P.Is the “knee-kick” a reflex act?American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1887, 43, 88–101. (a).
22.
LombardW. P.The variations of the normal knee-jerk, and their relation to the activity of the central nervous system. American Journal of Psychology, 1887, 1, 5–71. (b).
23.
LombardW. P.On the nature of the knee-jerk. Journal of Physiology, 1889, 10, 122–148.
