Simulated jurors (91 male and 116 female undergraduates) judged the guilt of and assigned the sentence for a defendant in an ambiguous murder case. Severity of crime and sentence decreased significantly with increasing stage of moral reasoning. The addition of evidence interpretable as guilt by association produced less severe guilt and sentence decisions at the preconventional and conventional stages. Results were discussed in light of numerous person-perception ratings of the victim and defendant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArbuthnotJ.Relationships between, maturity of moral judgment and measures of cognitive abilities. Psychological Reports, 1973, 33, 945–946.
2.
ArbuthnotJ.FaustD.Teaching moral reasoning: Theory and practice. New York: Harper & Row, 1981.
3.
ArbuthnotJ.WyattR.Effects of moral reasoning, authoritarianism, and political orientation on simulated juridic decisions. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, 1978.
4.
BoehmV. R.Mr. Prejudice, Miss Sympathy, and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring techniques to the problem of jury bias. Wisconsin Law Review, 1968, 734–750.
5.
CohnA.UdolfR.The criminal justice system and its psychology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979.
6.
EllisonK. W.BuckhoutR.Psychology and criminal justice. New York: Harper & Row, 1981.
7.
GrimP. F.KohlbergL.WhiteS. H.Some relationships between conscience and attentional processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 8, 239–252.
8.
HeiderF.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
9.
JurowG. Y.New data on the effect of a death qualified jury on the guilt determination process. Harvard Law Review, 1971, 84, 567–611.
10.
KohlbergL.Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In GoslinD. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969. Pp. 347–480.
11.
KohlbergL.Continuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. In BaltesP.SchaieK. (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 179–204.
12.
KohlbergL.Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In LickonaT. (Ed.), Moral development and behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976. Pp. 31–53.
13.
LernerM. J.Social psychology of justice and interpersonal attraction. In HustonT. L. (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Pp. 331–351.
14.
PercivalT. Q.Cognitive and motivational parallels in moral development. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1979, 11, 214–223.
15.
PiagetJ.The moral judgment of the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1932.
16.
RobinsonW. S.Bias, probability, and trial by jury. American Sociological Review, 1950, 15, 73–78.
17.
RubinZ.PeplauL. A.Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 65–90.
18.
SaksM. J.HastieR.Social psychology in court. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1978.
19.
Stephenson vs. State, Supreme Court of Indiana, 205 Ind. 141. North Eastern Reporter, 1932, 179, 633–667.
20.
TappJ. L.Psychology and the law: An overture. In RosenzweigM. R.PorterL. W. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology. Vol. 27. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1976. Pp. 43–48.
21.
WyattR.ArbuthnotJ.Moral judgment and simulated juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 104, 301–302.
