From 1969 to 1977 there was a generally downward trend in the proportion of studies in which rats were subjects, but this did not continue for the Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeachF. A.The snark was a boojum. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 115–124.
2.
BittermanM. E.Phyletic differences in learning. American Psychologist, 1965, 20, 396–410.
3.
GrossettD.RoyS.SharenowE.PolingA.Subjects used in JEAB articles: Is the snark a pigeon?The Behavior Analyst, in press.
4.
LockardR. B.The albino rat: A defensible choice or a bad habit?American Psychologist, 1968, 23, 734–742.
5.
SchrierA. M.Rattus revisited. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 681–682.
