Two experiments examined the relationship between number of training trials in a runway, various segments of the instrumental response, and effects of magnitude of reward. In each, separate groups of rats received 120 training trials with large and small rewards, respectively. Results of both experiments indicated that significant effects of magnitude were established and persisted in the start and run measures. Transitory effects of magnitude were shown in the goal measures of both experiments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmselA.The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 55, 102–119.
2.
BlackR. W.Incentive motivation and the parameters of reward in instrumental conditioning. In ArnoldW. J.LevinD. (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, Neb.: Univer. of Nebraska Press, 1969. Pp. 85–137.
3.
CampbellP. E.BatscheC. J.BatscheG. M.Spaced-trials reward magnitude effects in the rat: Single versus multiple food pellets. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972, 18, 360–364.
4.
CapaldiE. J.A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1967. Pp. 67–156.
5.
DalyH. B.Learning to escape cues paired with reward reductions following single- or multiple-pellet rewards. Psychonomic Science, 1972, 26, 49–52.
6.
DavisS. F.PrytulaR. E.SeagoJ. D.Hey Garvin! science is a game: A reply to McCain, Ward, and Lobb. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 7, 93–95.
7.
DavisS. F.SeagoJ. D.Reward magnitude effects as a function of within-day trial-by-trial analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980, 16, 363–366.
8.
GrindleyG. C.Experiments on the influence in the amount of reward on learning in young chickens. British Journal of Psychology, 1929, 20, 173–180.
9.
HullC. L.Principles of behavior. New York: Yale Univer. Press, 1943.
10.
LawrenceD. H.MillerN. E.A positive relationship between reinforcement and resistance to extinction produced by removing a source of confusion that had produced opposite results. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1947, 37, 494–509.
11.
McCainG.Different levels of performance with equivalent weights of reward. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 14, 2–3.
12.
McCainG.Reward magnitude and instrumental responses: Consistent and partial reward. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 139–141.
13.
McCainG.BoodeeA.LobbM.Extended training: Delay of reward. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977, 9, 111–112.
McCainG.WardR.LobbM.Reward magnitude and a comment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 7, 90–92.
16.
MetzgerR.CottonJ. W.LewisD. J.Effect of reinforcement magnitude and order of presentation of different magnitudes on runway behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1957, 50, 184–188.
17.
PrytulaR. E.DavisS. F.VoorheesJ. W.The effects of preexperimental diet upon reward magnitude effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978, 11, 117–119.
18.
SpenceK. W.Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, CT: Yale Univer. Press, 1956.
19.
WolfeJ. D.KaplonM. D.Effect of amount of reward and consummative activity on learning in chickens. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1941, 31, 353–361.
20.
ZeamanD.Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1949, 39, 466–483.
