The PPVT has been used as a screening instrument for evaluating potentially gifted students. It was recently replaced by the PPVT-R. The present study investigated the comparability of the two tests and of Forms L and M of the PPVT-R for 36 gifted students. All validity and reliability indices were statistically significant and ranged from .57 to .75. When means of various forms were compared the F ratio was significant, but the Newman-Keuls post hoc procedure identified only one statistically significant contrast, namely, the mean PPVT IQ was significantly higher than the mean PPVT-R, Form L, standard score.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrackenB. A.McCallumR. S.Comparison of the PPVT and PPVT-R for white and black preschool males and females. Educational and Psychological Research, 1981, 1, 79–85.
2.
BrackenB. A.McCallumR. S.PrasseD. P.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: an appraisal and review. Paper presented at the National Association of School Psychologists, Toronto, 1982.
3.
BrackenB. A.PrasseD. P.Comparison of PPVT, PPVT-R, and intelligence tests used for the placement of black, white, and Hispanic EMR students. Journal of School Psychology, in press.
DunnL. M.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, expanded manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1965.
6.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1981.
7.
NaglieriJ.NaglibriD.Comparison of the PPVT and PPVT-R for preschool children: implications for the practitioner. Psychology in the Schools, 1981, 18, 434–436.
