This study examined the relationships between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Sensing-Intuition and Thinking-Feeling scales, and the choice of autocratic versus participative decision-making methods as measured by the Vroom/Yetton Problem Set. Data from 62 graduate business students indicate that sensing types tend to be more participative than intuitive types. Further analyses suggest that situational factors may be more important than individual differences in influencing the choice of autocratic versus participative decision-making methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassanD. M.An examination of situational and contingency approaches to leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1980.
KerinR. A.SlocumJ. W.Decision-making style and acquisition of information: further exploration of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 1981, 49, 132–134.
10.
MyersI. B.Manual: the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1975.
11.
SlocumJ. W.Does cognitive style affect diagnosis and intervention strategies of change agents?Group and Organization Studies, 1978, 3, 199–210.
12.
SteckrothR. L.SlocumJ. W.SimsH. P.Organizational roles, cognitive roles, and problem-solving styles. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences, 1980, 1, 331–333.
13.
SteersR. M.Individual differences in participative decision-making. Human Relations, 1977, 30, 837–847.
14.
VroomV. H.JagoA. G.Decision making as a social process: normative and descriptive models of leader behavior. Decision Sciences, 1978, 5, 743–769.
15.
VroomV. H.YettonP. W.Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh: Univer. of Pittsburgh Press, 1973.
