The construct of defensive orientation is elaborated as a bipolar continuum which contrasts internal vs external styles in reacting to environmental events, paralleling the delineations in object relations theory. The tendency to accept feedback was hypothesized to be a function of defensive orientation; their relationship was tested by analyzing the reactions of 63 students to both fictitious and veridical feedback about personality tests. Results confirmed the hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ForerB. R.The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1949, 44, 118–123.
2.
GleserG. C.IhilevichD.An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33, 51–60.
3.
IhilevichD.GleserG. D.Relationship of defense mechanisms to field dependence-independence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 77, 296–302.
4.
JuniS.Classical projection a critique of experimental methodologies. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1980, 101, 119–146.
5.
JuniS.The composite measure of the Defense Mechanism Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 1982, in press.
6.
JuniS.MaslingJ.Reaction to aggression and the Defense Mechanism Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1980, 44, 484–486.
7.
KernbergO. F.Object-relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson, 1976.
8.
MichelsP. J.LayneC.Inventory responding models: people's acceptance of feedback “derived” from tests and from interviews. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1980, 44, 302–306.
9.
ScholtzJ. A.Defense styles in suicide attempters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 41, 70–73.
10.
SugarmanA. A.SheldonJ. B.RothC.Defense mechanisms in men and women alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcoholism, 1975, 36, 422–424.
