The multiplicity of procedures for dealing with formal complaints against psychologists is subjected to a critical review and analysis in the context of an in-depth case study. It is evident that there are sources of confusion and hazards for both the client-plaintiff and the therapist-defendant in the current network of professional, administrative, and legal procedures. Recommendations for changes are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association.Sex between therapist and patient. Symposium presented at the 129th annual meeting, May, 1976.
2.
American Psychological Association.Casebook on ethical standards. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1967.
3.
American Psychological Association.Proposed procedural guidelines for state psychological association ethics committees. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1972.
4.
American Psychological Association.Clinical and theoretical issues in therapist-patient erotic contact. Symposium presented at the 85th annual meeting, August, 1977.
5.
American Psychological Association.Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1977.
6.
Association for Humanistic Psychology.Should a professional psychotherapist go to bed with his or her patient if mutually attracted?Symposium presented at the ninth annual meeting, August, 1971.
7.
BarryD. D.WhitcombH. R.The legal foundations of public administration. St. Paul, MN: West, 1981.
8.
BroadW. J.Fraud and the structure of science. Science, 1981, 212, 137–141.
9.
ChesnerP.Women and madness. New York: Avon, 1973.
10.
Committee on Professional Standards Review.Professional Standards Review Committee policy and procedure manual. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, June, 1979.
11.
DavisK. W.Administrative law and government. St. Paul, MN: West, 1961.
12.
Hare-MustinR. T.MaracekJ.KaplanA. G.Liss-LevinsonN.Rights of clients, responsibilities of therapists. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 3–16.
13.
HaysJ. R.Sexual contact between psychotherapist and patient: Legal remedies. Psychological Reports, 1980, 47, 1247–1254.
14.
HessH. F.Enforcement: Procedures, problems, prospects. Professional Practice of Psychology, 1980, 1, 1–10.
15.
HolroydJ. D.BrodskyA. M.Psychologists' attitudes and practices regarding erotic and nonerotic physical contact with patients. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 843–849.
16.
KarasuT. B.The ethics of psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1980, 137, 1502–1512.
17.
MooreR. A.Ethics in the practice of psychiatry—origins, functions, models, and enforcement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1978, 135, 157–163.
Psychiatry on the couch.Times, 1979, 113 (April 2), 74–82.
20.
SandersJ. R.Keith-SpiegelP.Formal and informal adjudication of ethics complaints against psychologists. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 1096–1105.
21.
SchenkelK.APA's concern for privacy and confidentiality. The Clinical Psychologist, 1979, 32, 2–21.
22.
SinnettE. R.ThetfordP.Protecting clients and assessing malpractice. Professional Psychology, 1975, 6, 117–126.
23.
SmithR. C.Psychology and the courts: Some implications of recent judicial decisions for state licensing boards. Professional Psychology, 1979, 9, 489–497.
24.
TachaD. R.The Kansas open meeting act: Sunshine on the sunflower state?Kansas Law Review, 1977, 25, 169–214.
25.
WrightR.Psychologists and professional liability (malpractice) insurance: A retrospective review. The Clinical Psychologist, 1981, 34(No. 2), 21.
