This paper reports a study comparing the efficacy of financial incentive and personal contact in facilitating response to a mailed questionnaire. For 89 partially sighted school leavers the combination of factors significantly increased the speed of return of the questionnaires but did not affect the eventual response rate. The results highlight the limitations of single-variable studies of response-rate facilitators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlumbergH. H.FullerC.HareA. P.Response rates in postal surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974, 38, 113–123.
2.
HeberleinT.BaumgartnerR.Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 447–462.
3.
KvizF. J.Toward a standard definition of response rate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1977, 41, 265–267.
4.
LinskyA. S.Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires: A review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1975, 39, 82–101.
5.
RobinS. S.A procedure for securing returns to mail questionnaires. Sociology & Social Research, 1965, 50, 24–36.
6.
ShackletonV. J.WildJ. M.WolffeM.Screening optometric patients by questionnaire: Methods of improving response. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 1980, 57, 404–406.
