Subjects were placed into groups on the basis of either trait homogeneity or heterogeneity with the other group members and were given a group task to complete. The results indicated group answers of superior quality when the group was composed of heterogeneous individuals rather than homogeneous individuals.
ClementD. E.SchiereckJ. J.Jr.Sex composition and group performance in a visual signal detection task. Memory and Cognition, 1973, 1, 251–255.
3.
FenelonJ. R.MegargeeE. I.Influence of race on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 353–358.
4.
GeierJ.Manual for team development. Minneapolis: Performax Systems International, 1979.
5.
HoffmanL. R.Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 58, 27–32.
6.
HoffmanL. R.MaierN. R. F.Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1969, 62, 401–407.
7.
LaughlinP. R.BranchL. G.JohnsonH. H.Individuals versus triadic performance on a unidimensional complementary task as a function of initial ability level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 12, 144–150.
8.
RosenbergS.ErlickD. E.BerkowitzL.Some effects of varying combinations of group members on group performance measures and leadership behaviors. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 51, 195–203.
9.
ShawM. E.Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. Technical Report No. 1, Univer. of Florida, Contract NR 170–266, Nonr-580 (11), Office of Naval Research, 1963.
10.
ShawM. E.Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
