The effects of initial level of meaningfulness of CS on acquisition of new meaning was studied. Three groups of 10 children each were trained to associate words of positive, negative, or neutral evaluative meaning with nonsense syllables. Meaningfulness of the CS (low, middle, or high) was a between-groups variable. Conditioning was effective for the low- and middle-meaningfulness groups, and the degree of conditioning was negatively related to meaningfulness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenB. H.Role of awareness in meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 67, 373–378.
2.
DiVestaF. J.Contrast effects in the verbal conditioning of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 62, 535–543.
3.
FreemanN. C. G.SuedfeldP.Classical conditioning of verbal meaning: The roles of awareness, meaningfulness and evaluative loading. Psychological Record, 1969, 19, 335–338.
4.
LohrJ. M.StaatsA. W.Attitude conditioning in Sino-Tibetan languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 196–200.
5.
NobleC. E.Measurements of association values (a), rated associations (a’), and scaled meaningfulness (m’) for the 2100 CVC combinations of the English alphabet. Psychological Reports, 1961, 8, 487–521.
6.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.Factor analys'is of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 325–338.
7.
StaatsA. W.StaatsC. K.Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 74–80.
8.
WilsonW. H.Influence of prior level of meaningfulness on acquisition of new meaning. Psychological Reports, 1978, 42, 31–34.
