Christie's model of Machiavellianism is generally precise within the parameters it uses but it leaves out certain factors included in this study. Using the Mach IV and Mach V scales subjects were classified according to their mach level and asked to play in a Parcheesi-type board game. Results showed that the effects of Machiavellianism in bargaining are stronger than those of equity, that the composition of the group affects the winnings of high- and low-machs, and that Machiavellianism as a whole is more predictive of game winnings than either of its two main components, tactics or cynicism. Over-all, the Christie model is still very suitable and the present findings can make it more general.
BochnerA. P.BochnerB.A multivariate investigation of Machiavellianism and task structure in four-man groups. Speech Monographs, 1972, 39, 277–285.
3.
BraginskyD. D.Machiavellianism and manipulative interpersonal behavior in children: Two exploratory studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Connecticut, 1966.
4.
ChristieR.GeisF.Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
5.
CronbachL. J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297–334.
6.
DurkinJ. E.Encountering: What low-machs do. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, 1967.
7.
GeisF.Machiavellianism in a three-person game. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Univer., 1964.
8.
GoldA. R.ChristieR.FriedmanL. N.Fists and flowers: A social psychological interpretation of student dissent. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
9.
KlughH. E.Statistics: The essentials for research. New York: Wiley, 1970.
10.
LandamS.LorrM.Untangling the structure of Machiavellianism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1975, 31, 301–302.
11.
MartinezD. C.The structure of Machiavellianism in groups and its relation to bargaining effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Univer., 1979.
12.
MischelW.Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 252–283.
13.
NachamieS.Machiavellianism in children: The Children's Mach Scale and bluffing game. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Univer., 1969.
14.
RogersR.SeminG.Mach V: An improved scoring system based on a triadic choice model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, 34–40.
15.
SlusherE. A.RoeringK. J.RoseG. L.The effects of commitment to future interaction in single plays of three games. Behavioral Science, 1974, 19, 119–132.
16.
StoneW. F.RussR.Machiavellianism as tough-mindedness. Journal of Social Psychology, 1976, 98, 213–220.
17.
TurnerC. F.MartinezD. C.Socioeconomic achievement and the Machiavellian personality. Sociometry, 1977, 40, 325–336.
18.
WahlinW. S.Machiavellianism and winning or losing mathematical games. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Univer., 1967.
