A mock juror-simulation was utilized to analyze the effect of socio-economic status on the tendency to be viewed as a typical offender. Student-subjects (n = 386) were presented a newspaper article in which an individual, varied by social class, was being tried for one of two crimes, petty larceny or armed robbery. As hypothesized, the lower the stimulus person's social class, the lower the perceived personal attractiveness and the higher the tendency to be viewed as a typical offender.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettN. J.FeildH. S.Character of the defendant and length of sentence in rape and burglary crimes. Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 104, 271–277.
2.
ErlangerH. S.Jury research in America: its past and future. Law and Society Review, 1970, 4, 345–370.
3.
GerbasiK. C.ZuckermanM.ReisH. T.Justice needs a new blindfold: a review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 323–345.
4.
HamiltonD. L.A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press, 1979. Pp. 53–84.
5.
HeiderF.The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
6.
IzzettR. R.LeginskiW.Group discussion and the influence of defendant characteristics in a simulated jury setting. Journal of Social Psychology, 1974, 93, 271–279.
7.
LandyD.AronsonE.The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141–152.
8.
MicheliniR. L.SnodgrassS. R.Defendant characteristics and juridic decisions. Journal of Research in Personality, 1980, 14, 340–350.
9.
NemethC.SosisR. H.A simulated jury study: characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 1973, 90, 221–229.
10.
O'ConnellP. J. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of sociology. Guilford, CT: Dushkin, 1974.
11.
ReynoldsD. E.SandersM. S.Effect of defendant attractiveness, age, and injury on severity of sentence given by simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, 96, 149–150.
12.
ShepherdD. H.SloanL. R.Similarity of legal attitudes, defendant social class, and crime intentionality as determinants of legal decisions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979, 5, 245–248.
13.
SigallH.LandyD.Effects of the defendant's character and suffering on juridic judgment: a replication and clarification. Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 88, 149–150.
14.
WhiteG. F.Public response to hypothetical crimes: effect of offender and victim status and seriousness of the offense on punitive reactions. Social Forces, 1975, 53, 411–419.
