78 subjects who had participated in experiments involving deception and the use of aversive contingencies were interviewed and completed a questionnaire concerning their reactions to the study. Of the subjects, 20% were “bothered” by some aspect of the experiment. Subjects' dissatisfaction was greatest and lasted longest for issues other than deception and the use of aversives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ad Hoc Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research.Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1973.
2.
Canada Council. Report of the Consulting Group on Ethics. Ethics. Ottawa: Canada Council, 1975.
3.
ClarkR. D., III, & Ward, L. E. Where is the apathetic bystander? Situational characteristics of the emergency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 279–387.
4.
MilgramS.Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
5.
WestS. G.GunnS. P.Some issues of ethics and social psychology. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 30–38.
6.
ZimbardoOnP. G.The ethics of intervention in human psychological research: With special reference to the Stanford Prison experiment. Cognition, 1974, 21, 243–256.
